[Numpy-discussion] "Proposal to accept NEP 34: Disallow inferring dtype=object from sequence

[Marcelo Gasparian Gosling]

I also support this. Small price in edge case usability for a lot less
shooting yourself in the foot

On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 11:29 PM Juan Nunez-Iglesias <jni at fastmail.com>
wrote:

> For what it’s worth, I support this NEP. I have indeed seen this mistake
> often when teaching NumPy.
>
> > On 17 Nov 2019, at 8:43 am, Matti Picus <matti.picus at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I propose to move the NEP https://numpy.org/neps/nep-0034.html from
> "draft" to "accepted" status. There were no objections (actually there were
> no responses at all) to the mail proposing the NEP
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2019-October/080200.html
> .
> >
> >
> > PR 14794 https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/14794 is an implementation
> of the first step, deprecating current automatic detection,
> >
> >
> > f there are no substantive objections within 7 days from this email,
> then the NEP will be accepted; see NEP 0 for more details.
> >
> >
> > Matti
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> > NumPy-Discussion at python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20191118/6e944114/attachment.html>