[Numpy-discussion] NEP Procedure Discussion
adrin.jalali at gmail.com
Fri Aug 14 10:04:36 EDT 2020
Somewhat relevant, this is the discussion around the same topic we've been
having in scikit-learn:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 2:36 PM Ilhan Polat <ilhanpolat at gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, not to be a complete slacker, I'd like to add to this list;
> - How can I help as an external lib maintainer?
> - Do you even want us to get involved before the final draft? Or wait
> until internal discussion finishes?
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 1:23 PM Peter Andreas Entschev <peter at entschev.com>
>> Hi all,
>> During the discussion about NEP-35, there have been lots of
>> discussions around the NEP process itself. In the interest of allowing
>> people who are mostly interested in this discussion and to avoid
>> drifting so much off-topic in that thread, I'm starting this new
>> thread to discuss the NEP procedure.
>> A few questions that have been raised so far:
>> - Is the NEP Template  a guideline to be strictly followed or a
>> suggestion for authors?
>> - Who should decide when a NEP is sufficiently clear?
>> - Should a NEP PR be merged at all until it's sufficiently clear or
>> should it only be merged even in Draft state only after it's
>> sufficiently clear?
>> - What parts of the NEP are necessary to be clear for everyone? Just
>> Abstract? Motivation and Scope? Everything, including the real
>> technical details of implementation?
>> - Would it be possible to have proof-readers -- preferably people who
>> are not at all involved in the NEP's topic?
>> Please feel free to comment on that and add any major points I might
>> have missed.
>>  https://github.com/numpy/numpy/blob/master/doc/neps/nep-template.rst
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
>> NumPy-Discussion at python.org
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion at python.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the NumPy-Discussion