[Numpy-discussion] (no subject)

[Charles R Harris]

On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:19 PM Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:15 PM Charles R Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:31 AM Ralf Gommers <ralf.gommers at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 7:14 AM Sandro Tosi <morph at debian.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> hey!
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 7:52 PM Charles R Harris
>>>> <charlesr.harris at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Downstream developers should use Cython >= 0.29.16 for Python 3.8
>>>> support and OpenBLAS >= 3.7 to avoid wrong results on the Skylake
>>>> architecture. The NumPy Wheels for this release can be downloaded from
>>>> PyPI, source archives and release notes are available from Github.
>>>>
>>>> just so that i can re-configure (if necessary) our automation in
>>>> Debian, is this going to be the future setting for releasing numpy?
>>>> wheels via PyPI and source via github? I stumbled upon this since
>>>> there's no source release available on PyPI for 1.19.0rc2
>>>>
>>>
>>> That looks like a mistake. An sdist must be uploaded to PyPI, after the
>>> wheels are uploaded. That just seems to have been forgotten for rc2.
>>>
>>> Also, I had expected the sdist to be the .tar.gz format, I can't find it
>>> back but IIRC that's what we decided in the past. It's smaller, and it's
>>> what pretty much all other projects do.
>>>
>>>
>> NumPy has always used zip since PyPI limited the number of source
>> releases. We did that before SciPy.
>>
>>
> And I did upload the source file
>
>   947  twine upload release/installers/*.whl
>   948  twine upload release/installers/*.zip
>
> Wonder what happened to it? Maybe I missed an upload failure?
>
>
Should be fixed.

Chuck
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20200602/b163cc23/attachment-0001.html>