[Patches] [Patch #101055] Cookie.py

Andrew Kuchling akuchlin@mems-exchange.org
Fri, 18 Aug 2000 16:48:37 -0400


[Overquoting for the sake of python-dev readers]

On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 04:06:20PM -0400, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
>amk writes:
> > I have a copy of Tim O'Malley's Cookie.py,v file (in order to preserve the
> > version history).  I can either ask the SF admins to drop it into
> > the right place in the CVS repository, but will that screw up the
> > Python 1.6 tagging in some way?  (I would expect not, but who
> > knows?)
>
>  That would have no effect on any of the Python tagging.  It's
>probably worthwhile making sure there are no tags in the ,v file, but
>that can be done after it gets dropped in place.
>  Now, Greg Stein will tell us that dropping this into place is the
>wrong thing to do.  What it *will* screw up is people asking for the
>state of Python at a specific date before the file was actually added;
>they'll get this file even for when it wasn't in the Python CVS tree.
>I can live with that, but we should make a policy decision for the
>Python tree regarding this sort of thing.

Excellent point.  GvR's probably the only person whose ruling matters
on this point; I'll try to remember it and bring it up whenever he
gets back (next week, right?).

>  Don't -- it's not worth it.

I hate throwing away information that stands even a tiny chance of
being useful; good thing the price of disk storage keeps dropping, eh?
The version history might contain details that will be useful in
future debugging or code comprehension, so I dislike losing it
forever.

(My minimalist side is saying that the enhanced Web tools should be a
separately downloadable package.  But you probably guessed that
already...)

--amk