[Patches] [Patch #101211] list comprehensions: require initial for clause

noreply@sourceforge.net noreply@sourceforge.net
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 18:37:03 -0700


Patch #101211 has been updated. 

Project: 
Category: None
Status: Open
Summary: list comprehensions: require initial for clause

Follow-Ups:

Date: 2000-Aug-17 15:55
By: montanaro

Comment:
Description of the patch in the patch itself.

-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2000-Aug-21 20:03
By: tim_one

Comment:
Skip, did you and/or Ping track down the problem you thought there might be with this?  Or am I misremembering email?  (Ironic note:  we moved to the SF patch manager so discussions wouldn't get lost!)
-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2000-Aug-21 21:14
By: montanaro

Comment:
Yes, Ping found and fixed the problem.  The patch that I
submitted should do the right thing.  I'm reassigning it to
Guido for his  pronouncement.  I believe it's ready to go.

(I am still pretty unclear on the sequence of events that
are required to take a patch from idea to cvs checkin...)

-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2000-Aug-21 21:24
By: gvanrossum

Comment:
Thanks!  To both of you.  Also for the doc additions.

Skip, please check it in and then set the status to Closed.

When you submit a patch (or update one), it's best to leave it unassigned or assign it to the release manager (today still Tim, after tomorrow Jeremy).

If it *needs* BDFL pronouncement, the release manager will assign it to me with appropriate comments.

Note: the patch part for graminit.c failed -- you may want to run pgen again before you check it in.
-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2000-Aug-21 21:29
By: tim_one

Comment:
Thanks, Skip!  Have you read

http://python.sourceforge.net/sf-faq.html#a1

?  If there's something about the patch process that wasn't answered there, let me know.  I must say that, from my POV as "interim release manager" the past couple weeks, few people are playing along with the intent -- it's like nothing *moves* unless I step in to kick, prod or harass.

You assigning this to the person *you* believe should take the next step is exactly how it's supposed to work.  Thanks for taking the initiative!
-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2000-Aug-21 21:37
By: tim_one

Comment:
Assigned back to Skip since Guido Pronounced.  Please feel free to check it in and Close it after addressing his comments.
-------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------
For more info, visit:

http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=101211&group_id=5470