[Patches] GC infrastructure patch 1 (tp_recurse, tp_clear)
Neil Schemenauer
nascheme@enme.ucalgary.ca
Fri, 16 Jun 2000 12:22:04 -0600
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 10:09:01AM +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Uhm, I was referring to the memory costs of those 3 additional
> words needed for every GC aware object, not so much the
> performance costs.
Hmm, I'm not following you here. How does using the free lists
save the 3 words of memory?
Neil
--
"Simplicity does not precede complexity, but follows it." -- Alan Perlis