[Patches] [ python-Patches-471120 ] Upgraded Tix.py

noreply@sourceforge.net noreply@sourceforge.net
Thu, 01 Nov 2001 19:50:16 -0800


Patches item #471120, was opened at 2001-10-14 14:18
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=471120&group_id=5470

Category: Tkinter
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Internet Discovery (idiscovery)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Upgraded Tix.py

Initial Comment:
One minor bugfix to DisplayStyle.cget

Improved doc strings.

Placeholder classes for classes still to be wrapped.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Internet Discovery (idiscovery)
Date: 2001-11-01 19:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=33229

The removal of the entry in item_cget is a mistake. Specifically, 
delete the following lines from the patch:

***************
*** 730,736 ****
         c = self.tk.call(self._w, 'info', 'selection')
         return self.tk.splitlist(c)
  
!     def item_cget(self, entry, col, opt):
         return self.tk.call(self._w, 'item', 'cget', entry, col, opt)
   
      def item_configure(self, entry, col, cnf={}, **kw):
--- 944,950 ----
         c = self.tk.call(self._w, 'info', 'selection')
         return self.tk.splitlist(c)
  
!     def item_cget(self,  col, opt):
         return self.tk.call(self._w, 'item', 'cget', entry, col, opt)
   
I think this patch just fills in gaps rather than adding new features.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Date: 2001-10-19 05:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6380

I agree this can go in after 2.2b1.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2001-10-19 03:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

Why does this patch remove the "entry" argument to item_cget?

Note that it missed the 2.2b1 branch creation; since it adds
new features, it is not clear whether this can go into 2.2
still (IMO it should).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Internet Discovery (idiscovery)
Date: 2001-10-18 13:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=33229

New Tix.py as diff -c

3 new classes wrapped, and

tix command added.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2001-10-15 12:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

Could you please provide the patch as a context (-c) or 
unified (-u) diff? Also, could you please base it on the 
latest version of Tix.py (1.4)? Please have a look at

http://python.sourceforge.net/sf-faq.html

for details.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=471120&group_id=5470