[Patches] [ python-Patches-660524 ] Cygwin datetime module patch

[noreply@sourceforge.net]

Patches item #660524, was opened at 2002-12-31 22:22
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=660524&group_id=5470

Category: Modules
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jason Tishler (jlt63)
Assigned to: Jason Tishler (jlt63)
Summary: Cygwin datetime module patch

Initial Comment:
The attached patch enables the datetime module
to build cleanly under Cygwin.

OK to apply?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-12-31 23:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

I take the acceptance back, see

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-December/031534.html

Please revise the patch appropriately. Also please produce
patches for all prior changes that you made to remove
initialization out of static structures.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-12-31 22:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

The changes will certainly go into 2.3a2, which is still
weeks ahead (and that will be branched from the mainline,
again); see PEP 283. 2.3a1 is being prepared right now, and
only PythonLabs can make changes to it.

Happy New Year to you, too!


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Tishler (jlt63)
Date: 2002-12-31 22:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=86216

> Do you notice that all those changes won't make it
> anymore into 2.3a1?

No.

Will they make it into 2.3?  Or, do I have to wait until 2.3.x?
Or, 2.4?

BTW, I have a nasty test_format SEGV that I have been
fighting with for a while.  I think that it is a Cygwin malloc
problem, but I'm not sure. Do you know of anyone who would
be willing to help?

BTW, Happy New Year!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-12-31 22:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

That patch is fine as well.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-12-31 22:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

Do you notice that all those changes won't make it anymore
into 2.3a1? There is a moratorium on checking in changes
right now, although I'm unsure whether this applies to the
release branch only.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jason Tishler (jlt63)
Date: 2002-12-31 22:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=86216

I think that SF is screwed up.  Netscape doesn't work either.
It appears that attaching a patch when submitting a new
patch is broken. Adding it later seems to be OK. Sigh...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=660524&group_id=5470