[Patches] [ python-Patches-504889 ] make setup.py less chatty by default

noreply@sourceforge.net noreply@sourceforge.net
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 08:45:17 -0800


Patches item #504889, was opened at 2002-01-17 07:02
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=504889&group_id=5470

Category: Distutils and setup.py
Group: Python 2.3
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeremy Hylton (jhylton)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: make setup.py less chatty by default

Initial Comment:
I don't like the amount of output that setup.py
produces by default, and I don't like the way that -q
and -v affect the amount of output.  In general, I want
setup.py to tell me what it is doing and not what it is
skippping.  It's fine to say nothing with -q, but it
shouldn't say more without -v.

The attached patch is a bit of a kludge, but I'm not
familiar enough with distutils to do any better.  One
problem is that -v/--verbose has previously handled as
a flag, either on or off.  (There is a curiously large
amount of code that compares this boolean to see if
it's greater than some number!)  I had the options
processor to treat self.verbose as a count of -v
options.  So -vv is more verbose than -v.

Then I change the specific prints and announcements
that I've seen with setup.py that I didn't want to see.
 The messages I don't want to see (unless verbose is
high) are about skipping builds of Extensions and not
copying files that are already up-to-date.

With this patch in place, setup.py tells me only the
extensions is actually builds and files it actually copies.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Michael Hudson (mwh)
Date: 2002-01-17 08:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6656

Hokay, next question: why the "assert 0" in cmd.py?  Are you
sure you've finished?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jeremy Hylton (jhylton)
Date: 2002-01-17 08:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31392

Er, context diff.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Michael Hudson (mwh)
Date: 2002-01-17 07:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=6656

Um, context diff?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=504889&group_id=5470