[Patches] [ python-Patches-559250 ] more POSIX signal stuff
noreply@sourceforge.net
noreply@sourceforge.net
Thu, 23 May 2002 06:49:11 -0700
Patches item #559250, was opened at 2002-05-22 15:59
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=559250&group_id=5470
Category: Modules
Group: Python 2.3
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Hudson (mwh)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: more POSIX signal stuff
Initial Comment:
I got annoyed with Python not having sigsuspend et al,
so I wrote this.
It's not finished yet:
it doesn't do autoconf checks, so if you don't have
posix signal handling, it ain't gonna compile)
it doesn't do docs.
it doesn't do full-on sigaction (because that's not
what I was after).
but first I thought I'd see if any of the more unix
savvy Pythoneers (Martin? Barry?) could see any
enormous flaws in the approach...
It does seem to work, so far.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Michael Hudson (mwh)
Date: 2002-05-23 13:49
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=6656
Try this instead. Definitely a good call on the interface
front.
Still same caveats.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Michael Hudson (mwh)
Date: 2002-05-23 09:52
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=6656
Hmm, fair point. I just got carried away :)
Patch later.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-05-22 17:07
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=21627
I wonder whether we have to expose the API for signal sets.
Couldn't we just use lists/tuples of integers? This ought to
be similar to the processing of FD_SETs in select.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=559250&group_id=5470