[Patches] [ python-Patches-585913 ] Adds Galeon support to webbrowser.py
noreply@sourceforge.net
noreply@sourceforge.net
Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:50:58 -0700
Patches item #585913, was opened at 2002-07-24 09:27
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=585913&group_id=5470
Category: Library (Lib)
Group: Python 2.3
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Greg Copeland (oracle)
Assigned to: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Summary: Adds Galeon support to webbrowser.py
Initial Comment:
Simple context diff against current CVS tree to add
support for Galeon to webbrowser.py
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2002-10-10 18:50
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=33168
Checked in as Lib/webbrowser.py 1.33
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Greg Copeland (oracle)
Date: 2002-10-10 09:30
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=40173
Ya thanks for cleaning it up. After I submitted the patch,
I realized that I had left some print statements hanging around.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-10-10 04:44
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=21627
Neal, thanks for testing it. This is all this patch has been
waiting for, so please apply it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2002-10-09 19:35
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=33168
Martin, I've closed the other (duplicate) patch. I've
attached a new patch here with a few cleanups. I manually
tested that this works with galeon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-08-12 19:48
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=21627
If the patch has been accepted, its Resolution will be set
to accepted, and SF will send you a message - so no, it
hasn't been accepted yet.
I still haven't found the time to compare the two patches,
and nobody else has presented any clear analysis of the
relative qualities, so I still don't know which one to
accept - apparently, nobody else has looked at them, either.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Greg Copeland (oracle)
Date: 2002-08-12 14:12
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=40173
Has then patch been accepted? What's the standard why of
letting people know if a patch has been accepted or rejected?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Greg Copeland (oracle)
Date: 2002-07-26 15:56
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=40173
Not really sure. I assume it's just a second patch by
another author.
What can I say, day late and a dollar short. ;)
Having looked at the other patch, it appears mine is a
little more well rounded/complete/feature rich, if only
slightly. I invite you to take a look for your self. I'm
also not sure what version of webbrowser.py the other patch
is against. My patch is against the CVS version so it will
be a breeze to apply.
Enjoy!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-07-26 14:54
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=21627
How does this relate to
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=586437&group_id=5470&atid=305470
?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=585913&group_id=5470