[Patches] [ python-Patches-585913 ] Adds Galeon support to webbrowser.py

[noreply@sourceforge.net]

Patches item #585913, was opened at 2002-07-24 09:27
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=585913&group_id=5470

Category: Library (Lib)
Group: Python 2.3
>Status: Closed
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Greg Copeland (oracle)
Assigned to: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Summary: Adds Galeon support to webbrowser.py

Initial Comment:
Simple context diff against current CVS tree to add
support for Galeon to webbrowser.py


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2002-10-10 18:50

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=33168

Checked in as Lib/webbrowser.py 1.33

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Greg Copeland (oracle)
Date: 2002-10-10 09:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=40173

Ya thanks for cleaning it up.  After I submitted the patch,
I realized that I had left some print statements hanging around.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-10-10 04:44

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

Neal, thanks for testing it. This is all this patch has been
waiting for, so please apply it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2002-10-09 19:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=33168

Martin, I've closed the other (duplicate) patch.  I've
attached a new patch here with a few cleanups.  I manually
tested that this works with galeon.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-08-12 19:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

If the patch has been accepted, its Resolution will be set
to accepted, and SF will send you a message - so no, it
hasn't been accepted yet.

I still haven't found the time to compare the two patches,
and nobody else has presented any clear analysis of the
relative qualities, so I still don't know which one to
accept - apparently, nobody else has looked at them, either.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Greg Copeland (oracle)
Date: 2002-08-12 14:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=40173

Has then patch been accepted?  What's the standard why of
letting people know if a patch has been accepted or rejected?


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Greg Copeland (oracle)
Date: 2002-07-26 15:56

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=40173

Not really sure.  I assume it's just a second patch by
another author.

What can I say, day late and a dollar short.  ;)

Having looked at the other patch, it appears mine is a
little more well rounded/complete/feature rich, if only
slightly.  I invite you to take a look for your self.  I'm
also not sure what version of webbrowser.py the other patch
is against.  My patch is against the CVS version so it will
be a breeze to apply.

Enjoy!


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-07-26 14:54

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

How does this relate to

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=586437&group_id=5470&atid=305470

?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=585913&group_id=5470