[Patches] [ python-Patches-725569 ] Improved output for unittest failUnlessEqual

[SourceForge.net]

Patches item #725569, was opened at 2003-04-22 12:33
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by theller
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=725569&group_id=5470

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Duncan Booth (duncanb)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Improved output for unittest failUnlessEqual

Initial Comment:
The failUnlessEqual method in unittest.TestCase 
doesn't handle well the case where the objects being 
compared have a long string representation. The 
whole repr for each object is printed no matter how 
long, and no indication is given of where any 
differences occur.

This patch uses difflib on long representations to 
provide a short output that highlights where the first 
difference actually is. It also limits the output for each 
value to fit on a single line (with the differences 
indicated on the line following).

e.g.
FAIL: test_failunlessEqual4 (__main__.Test)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TestFailed: failUnlessEqual
{'A': 65, 'C': 67, ...0, 'P ': 0, 'R': 82, 'U': 85, 'T': 84, 'W': 
87, 'V': 8...
                   ...    ^^   ^                                            ...
{'A': 65, 'C': 67, ...0, 'S': 83, 'R': 82, 'U': 85, 'T': 84, 'W': 
87, 'V': 8...
                   ...    ^   ^^                                            ...
  File "F:\temp\test.py", line 59, in test_failunlessEqual4
    self.failUnlessEqual(d2, d1)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

The attached file contains the changes, assuming that 
patch "722638 Better output for unittest" has already 
been applied.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Thomas Heller (theller)
Date: 2003-04-25 12:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=11105

There's a bug in your patch:

!     else:
!         x, y = s[:LINELEN+1], t[:LINELEN+1]
!         left = 0

s and t are not defined here (UnboundLocal exception is raised),

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=725569&group_id=5470