[Patches] [ python-Patches-668124 ] struct.pack("I", -3) doesn't raise an exception
SourceForge.net
noreply@sourceforge.net
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 08:16:44 -0800
Patches item #668124, was opened at 2003-01-14 15:39
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=668124&group_id=5470
Category: Modules
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Thomas Heller (theller)
Assigned to: Thomas Heller (theller)
>Summary: struct.pack("I", -3) doesn't raise an exception
Initial Comment:
Each time I try to 'steal' code from Python, I seem to
find a bug ;-)
This bug is also in 2.2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2003-01-16 11:16
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=31435
This should definitely be brought up on Python-Dev. The
rules for what struct will and won't accept are an historical
minefield, and if "I" stops accepting negative Python (short)
ints, I expect lots of code would break.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2003-01-16 10:55
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=33168
Oops, I spoke too soon. test_grammar failed -- max negative int
Not sure if that's a test problem or something else, but it
needs to be addressed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2003-01-16 10:54
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=33168
I'm convinced it's a bug. The patch is fine, but a NEWS
item and test should also be added.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Thomas Heller (theller)
Date: 2003-01-16 05:26
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=11105
Don't know if this is a bug or not (and to be honest, I don't
care). I just have the habit to report these things when I find
them.
IMO it's at least inconsitent that all the unsigned format
codes "HLQ" don't accept negative numbers, but "IL" do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2003-01-15 17:21
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=33168
This didn't raise an exception in 2.1.1 either. Is this
really a bug or just the behaviour? Should the fix be to update
doc rather than code? Don't you need to fix get_ulonglong()
in a similar way?
I'm not necessarily against the patch, perhaps this should
be brought up on python-dev?
If the patch is accepted, you need to make a NEWS entry, and
probably should update libstruct.tex.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Thomas Heller (theller)
Date: 2003-01-14 15:42
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=11105
This is an upper-case 'i', meaning 'unsigned int'.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=668124&group_id=5470