[Patches] [ python-Patches-819012 ] Fix for former/latter confusion
in Extending documentation
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Fri Nov 7 06:46:41 EST 2003
Patches item #819012, was opened at 2003-10-07 04:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by mwh
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=819012&group_id=5470
Category: Documentation
Group: Python 2.3
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Tony Meyer (anadelonbrin)
Assigned to: Michael Hudson (mwh)
Summary: Fix for former/latter confusion in Extending documentation
Initial Comment:
Section 1.10 ("Reference Counts" in Extending Python)
has this:
"In C++, the operators new and delete are used with
essentially the same meaning and we'll restrict the
following discussion to the latter."
However, the following discussion uses malloc() and free
() (i.e. "the former"), not new and delete. Either this
should be corrected to say "the former" (as with the
attached one line patch), or the whole section should be
corrected to use new and delete.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Michael Hudson (mwh)
Date: 2003-11-07 11:46
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=6656
Fixed in revision 1.26 of Doc/ext/extending.tex but by
changing the offending text to "restrict the following
discussion to the C case."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2003-11-06 21:17
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=21627
Assigning to mwh, who introduced this confusion in
extending.tex 1.23. I don't think "the former" is more
clear, as it might just refer to the keyword "new", as
opposed to they keyword "delete", which would be "the latter".
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=819012&group_id=5470
More information about the Patches
mailing list