[Patches] [ python-Patches-510695 ] cycle profiler for VM opcodes

[SourceForge.net]

Patches item #510695, was opened at 2002-01-30 08:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tim_one
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=510695&group_id=5470

Category: Core (C code)
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Out of Date
Priority: 1
Submitted By: Jeremy Hylton (jhylton)
Assigned to: Jeremy Hylton (jhylton)
Summary: cycle profiler for VM opcodes

Initial Comment:
This is just some code I'm noodling around with.  It
counts the number of cycles each Python VM opcode takes
to execute, using the Pentium timestamp counter.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2004-03-21 14:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Changed resolution from Accepted to Out-of-Date -- several 
parts of this patch fail to apply now.  Leaving assigned to 
Jeremy.  Still seems like a fine idea to me!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2004-03-21 14:23

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Changed resolution from Accepted to Out-of-Date -- several 
parts of this patch fail to apply now.  Leaving assigned to 
Jeremy.  Still seems like a fine idea to me!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Tim Peters (tim_one)
Date: 2004-03-21 14:22

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31435

Changed resolution from Accepted to Out-of-Date -- several 
parts of this patch fail to apply now.  Leaving assigned to 
Jeremy.  Still seems like a fine idea to me!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2003-09-20 07:40

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

OTOH, the patch is prepared for temporary usage, by means of
a configure option. Since nobody has been objecting
strongly, I'll accept this patch.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Armin Rigo (arigo)
Date: 2002-11-12 08:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=4771

I think that you should try and convince people that it is a
generally useful information to have, and that the fact that
it is highly non-portable does not hurt.  Right now it looks
more like a change that a core developer would temporarily
want to do to tune the VM.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jeremy Hylton (jhylton)
Date: 2002-10-09 11:16

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31392

sure


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2002-10-07 17:12

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

Is this still of relevance?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=510695&group_id=5470