[Pydotorg-redesign] Logo question

[Todd Grimason]

Uh-oh I must have been more confusing than usual - I didn't meant to imply any of the proposed designs were not good, I was specifically wondering about the logo itself, and whether it was set in stone forever.

I think using one of the new designs would be a great start, I suppose I'm thinking (too)big-picture here... and of some theoretical future big overhaul...

I will re-visit the offerings up so far and put in my 2 cents if it seems it might help in any way.

-Todd

* Todd Grimason <todd at slack.net> [2003-07-23 13:53]:
> 
> * A.M. Kuchling <amk at amk.ca> [2003-07-23 13:11]: 
> > I don't know about other people, but my current goals are: * Fix the 
> > egregiously bad/outdated parts (the FAQ)
> > * Reduce some of the duplication (Summary vs. Intros, Events.html vs 
> > /conferences/)
> > * Improve usability from the standpoint of very inexperienced people who 
> > get directed to python.org.  (The site is probably OK for experienced 
> > users.)
> > * Improve usability of the exceedingly busy top page.  (If a new graphic 
> > design is necessary to get that done, so be it.)
> > 
> > It would be really nice to have most of these fixes in place for Python 
> > 2.3final,
> > which is a week away, and that's what I'm working toward.
> >
> 
> OK, I'm slowly catching up then... would my inquiry regarding the logo perhaps be more appropriate for the marketing-python list?
> 
> I don't want to hold anything up, and understand the importance of having the changes done by 2.3final.
> 
> I'll go over the archives and see what the constraints are and whether I can be any help with the immediate goals.
> 
> -Todd
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> ___________________________
> toddgrimason*todd at slack.net
> 
> 

-- 

___________________________
toddgrimason*todd at slack.net