[pydotorg-www] project plan
Richard Leland
rich at richleland.com
Wed Apr 21 17:21:53 CEST 2010
Thanks for all the feedback Skip! I'll read through and respond/apply to the
plan where appropriate.
- Rich
Richard Leland
rich at richleland.com
240-242-7424
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:11 AM, <skip at pobox.com> wrote:
>
> My feedback on Rich's outline document so far:
>
> * (Agility) I don't think the site content is difficult to update. It
> is in a fairly simple to read/write text format. Except when brain
> cramps get in my way, updating the site generally involves little more
> than editing the text and checking in the changed file(s). Switching
> to some kind of through-the-web editing system would be massive
> overkill in my opinion.
>
> As for the appearance, I lean more toward the simple Google end of the
> spectrum when it comes to website appearance, and I detest websites
> which think it's ok to spew out JavaScript or Flash animations which
> peg my computer's CPU. I do, however, think that whatever appearance
> you settle on should be used in the wiki as well. They are two sides
> of the same coin in my mind.
>
> * (Involvement) I agree that more involvement by the community would be
> beneficial. Frequently when the site has lagged behind content-wise I
> think it's because it contained content which was naturally dynamic.
> In several instances we have moved content to the wiki so the
> community can keep that content up-to-date.
>
> Regarding the wiki, while more community involvement is worthwhile,
> wikis can devolve into little more than a "bag of pages". I think
> some effort to provide overall structure to the wiki would be
> worthwhile. Deciding if/when to cull data from the wiki would also be
> helpful. (For example, frequently people create personal home pages
> on the wiki which contain nothing more than their email address - I
> guess that's the default with the home page template.)
>
> There are certain parts of the site which I think should not be turned
> over to a broader audience, however. In particular, download/release
> content, news and job postings should be fairly tightly controlled in
> my mind. I hope the reasons for tight control of download/release
> content are obvious.
>
> The job board seems to be a well-used part of the site, at least based
> on the number of posting requests I've seen and notes about taking
> down postings because positions have been filled. There is a fair
> amount of give-and-take at times between Martin and the people posting
> job announcements to help the submitters get their posts into
> reasonable form and with appropriate content. (At least once a month
> I would suspect that postings with no apparent Python relevance are
> sent to the jobs address.) The job board is a good marketing tool for
> Python the language. I think it would be a shame if the high quality
> of the content was diluted by lack of oversight.
>
> News postings fall into a similar category as a marketing tool. "Wow,
> look at all the Python events!" There is limited space on the site
> for news items. There appears to be room for five to seven items
> "above the fold" given the current layout. While I think it would be
> nice if more events could be posted, that is limited real estate.
> OTOH, maybe all news items could be submitted and will go out in the
> RSS feed, while only the most important are tagged for display on the
> website.
>
> Another area where we could use some help is in squashing/redirecting
> old content. Fairly frequently email arrives at the webmaster address
> referring to old pages from previous incarnations of the website which
> have broken links or are simply badly outdated. In almost all cases I
> think we should redirect to a page in the current website or wiki.
> Simply identifying old content would be a significant project. It
> would be great if the larger community could help identify old pages
> and a suitable redirect target. The folks who twiddle the bits on the
> web server config could set up the necessary redirection and take down
> the old page.
>
> * (Localization) I would like to see some way to highlight local user
> group meetings. I realize that's somewhat at odds with my comments
> above about news items. It might be worthwhile to also offer storage/
> display/indexing space for presentations from local user group talks.
>
> * (Extensibility) I'm not sure what you're after here. I think you need
> to expand, maybe give an example.
>
> * (Accessibility) Traditionally, aside from the main Python tutorial
> (which assumes some programming background) tutorial information for
> complete novice programmers has been left up to the broader community,
> then referenced from the main site or the wiki.
>
> (Thinking out loud here...)
>
> - I wonder if the PSF might consider funding a competent technical
> writer with essentially no programming experience to learn the
> language and produce a good tutorial aimed at complete novices.
>
> - Allowing the community to annotate the online documentation (though
> still keeping the actual documentation content "in-house" - sort of
> midway between a closed site and fully editable wiki) might be an
> excellent way to improve it. Users could point out errors, add
> examples, maybe even easily suggest ways to restructure signficant
> parts for easier use.
>
> - Would Google App Engine be a suitable environment for an interactive
> Python exploratorium?
>
> * (Presentation) As I indicated above I prefer a "lighter" look and
> feel. Sidebars can be handy, but we seem to have taken them to an
> extreme. With both constant-width left and right sidebars on the
> front page you lose anywhere from one third to one half of the space
> available to display actual content. That said, I am all for
> highlighting activities such as GSoC (maybe displayed as a thin banner
> across the top of the page?). I think you could move the "... uses
> Python" box to the bottom of the left-hand sidebar, eliminate the
> "What they are saying..." altogether, and merge the "Using Python
> For..." box into the left-hand sidebar as a dynamic hierarchical menu.
>
> Skip
> _______________________________________________
> pydotorg-www mailing list
> pydotorg-www at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pydotorg-www/attachments/20100421/d521abb7/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the pydotorg-www
mailing list