[pydotorg-www] feedburner account
ctrachte at gmail.com
Thu Apr 29 03:49:52 CEST 2010
On 4/28/10, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:51 AM, David Goodger <goodger at python.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 16:54, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com>
>>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 2:36 AM, Georg Brandl <georg at python.org> wrote:
>>>>> Forwarded to mysterious pydotorg.
>>>> Would you please stop making these allusions? There are perfectly
>>>> good reasons to have a private mailing list, even if you are not
>>>> required to agree with that.
>>> I just mention the fact that the role of this ML is unclear to general
>>> public and is not described anywhere - http://python.org/community/
>> Sure it is:
> I glad you know your bookmarks, but have you tried it this way?
> 1. http://python.org/
> 2. Help Maintain Website
> And I'd still insist on making pydotorg-www a primary contact point
> leaving webmaster@ only for security sensitive issues. It looks like
> pydotorg-www is made solely for chatting and its members receive tasks
> from upstream webmasters.
I'm sorry it looks that way, but this is not consistent with my
experience. I've had (not personal) misunderstandings with the psf
list (another private one); they turned out to be just that -
misunderstandings. No one has ever tried to give orders or even tried
to have me receive a task. How could that happen? I'm a volunteer.
If there's that little trust at the outset, it's going to be hard to
accomplish anything anyway.
I do not think many will be motivated to
> work in such environment.
You may be right about the perception regarding the way things are set
up. I for one am willing to take my chances. It's not like
python-org or the PSF are a cult that takes your money and sends you
to a farm collective to work for no pay. You can do that from home
My 2 cents.
> anatoly t.
> pydotorg-www mailing list
> pydotorg-www at python.org
More information about the pydotorg-www