From carl at personnelware.com Thu Dec 1 00:07:08 2011 From: carl at personnelware.com (Carl Karsten) Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:07:08 -0600 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Internal Server Error while reverting spam In-Reply-To: <20182.45942.28596.138180@montanaro.dyndns.org> References: <20111130144114.7841F21093B4@montanaro.dyndns.org> <20182.45942.28596.138180@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:51 PM, wrote: > ? ?Richard> BTW why are bit.ly links disallowed in wiki pages? I definitely > ? ?Richard> promote the j.mp URL these days over the bit.ly one but they're > ? ?Richard> effectively the same (same company). > > It looks like Paul Boddie added added bit.ly, t.co and goo.gl as patterns in > LocalBadContent back in October. ?His comment was > > ? ?Added some link-shorteners. These should never be used in this > ? ?environment. blacklisting them sounds reasonable to me. They are not needed for legitimate use. The content editor has (or can find) the real URL and use it. The person following the link will just click. If you allow them, spamers can use them at will and he whole LocalBadContent thing is kinda pointless. -- Carl K From richard at python.org Thu Dec 1 00:27:49 2011 From: richard at python.org (Richard Jones) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:27:49 +1100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Internal Server Error while reverting spam In-Reply-To: References: <20111130144114.7841F21093B4@montanaro.dyndns.org> <20182.45942.28596.138180@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: On 1 December 2011 10:07, Carl Karsten wrote: > They are not needed for legitimate use. I respectfully disagree. It's significantly easier to promote: j.mp/mpug than wiki.python.org/moin/MelbournePUG Richard From martin at v.loewis.de Thu Dec 1 06:05:45 2011 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2011 06:05:45 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Internal Server Error while reverting spam In-Reply-To: References: <20111130144114.7841F21093B4@montanaro.dyndns.org> <20182.45942.28596.138180@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <4ED70B29.6050809@v.loewis.de> Am 01.12.2011 00:27, schrieb Richard Jones: > On 1 December 2011 10:07, Carl Karsten wrote: >> They are not needed for legitimate use. > > I respectfully disagree. It's significantly easier to promote: > > j.mp/mpug > > than > > wiki.python.org/moin/MelbournePUG If you want to promote it, it doesn't need to be a hyperlink. IOW, you can have a link whose text label is j.mp/mpug for promotional purposes, yet has http://wiki.python.org/moin/MelbournePUG as the link target. Regards, Martin From paul at boddie.org.uk Thu Dec 1 01:38:23 2011 From: paul at boddie.org.uk (Paul Boddie) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 01:38:23 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Internal Server Error while reverting spam In-Reply-To: References: <20111130144114.7841F21093B4@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <201112010138.23619.paul@boddie.org.uk> On Thursday 01 December 2011 00:27:49 Richard Jones wrote: > On 1 December 2011 10:07, Carl Karsten wrote: > > They are not needed for legitimate use. > > I respectfully disagree. It's significantly easier to promote: > > j.mp/mpug > > than > > wiki.python.org/moin/MelbournePUG That may be the case, but *on* the Wiki, there's absolutely no reason why people can't use full URLs referring to the actual resource in question (but see my remarks below). The reason why I disallowed shortened URLs is that it's easy for people to post spam links and there be absolutely no initial indication that this is what they are. I certainly don't feel like checking random links to who-knows-where just because people don't want to be transparent about where they are linking to. I believe that such links primarily benefit spammers/scammers/tricksters (who don't want people to see where they are going) and people using Twitter (who are constrained by whichever architectural limitation that service still has), along with people needing to promote an easy-to-remember URL by word of mouth or on physical objects, potentially in that order. I accept that from trustworthy people like yourself, the promotional benefit outweighs the "I feel lucky" part of the experience that comes from using these URLs, but the balance is different when random people on the Internet are posting them to one's site. It is unfortunate if people don't get a nice error message if their edits are disallowed, but I am willing to improve that (without telling spammers how to defeat anti-spam mechanisms) if it would be appreciated - the "internal server error" probably shouldn't happen, and that may be fixed somehow by a review of the configuration. If you think that trusted users shouldn't be prevented from using shortened URLs that are mentioned for promotional purposes, say, then I am also willing to work towards a solution. This isn't empty rhetoric - I've already developed things like edit approval functionality for Moin, even though I doubt that it will ever be deployed because of cries of censorship or general inconvenience, just so that I have something to offer if/when people start to say that policing Wikis is too much work - so if you think that improvement is needed, I am prepared to spend some time making that improvement. I am sorry for the inconvenience caused, but please understand the motivation for eliminating what could easily be a source of significant additional work for those of us who volunteer to maintain this resource. Paul P.S. I also find it interesting that a bunch of people happily used domains leased from a now-defunct North African regime (some of whom walked the tightrope more happily than others, though) without any second thought, but that's a separate concern. Personally, I never gave it much thought myself, but then I largely ignored what the Web 2.0 crowd were doing until someone in the Mercurial community raised the matter in the context of mailing list messages. From techtonik at gmail.com Thu Dec 1 18:29:58 2011 From: techtonik at gmail.com (anatoly techtonik) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 20:29:58 +0300 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Internal Server Error while reverting spam In-Reply-To: References: <20111130144114.7841F21093B4@montanaro.dyndns.org> <20182.45942.28596.138180@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Richard Jones wrote: > On 1 December 2011 10:07, Carl Karsten wrote: > > They are not needed for legitimate use. > > I respectfully disagree. It's significantly easier to promote: > > j.mp/mpug > > than > > wiki.python.org/moin/MelbournePUG And it could be a little easier to type wiki.python.org/MelbournePUG if mysterious somebody could adjust web-server configuration accordingly. -- anatoly t. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From skip at pobox.com Fri Dec 2 03:00:29 2011 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 20:00:29 -0600 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Internal Server Error while reverting spam In-Reply-To: References: <20111130144114.7841F21093B4@montanaro.dyndns.org> <20182.45942.28596.138180@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <20184.12605.7226.162410@montanaro.dyndns.org> anatoly> And it could be a little easier to type wiki.python.org/MelbournePUG if mysterious somebody anatoly> could adjust web-server configuration accordingly. There's another layer in the URL which distinguishes the Python and Jython wikis. At least there used to be. Now I see the selector page briefly, then it redirects me to the last page I was viewing on the Python wiki. As a person who monitors both wikis (at least for spam postings, if not actual content), I'm a little disappointed that I can no longer go to wiki.python.org then select which wiki I want to dive into. Skip From paul at boddie.org.uk Fri Dec 2 09:27:20 2011 From: paul at boddie.org.uk (Paul Boddie) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 09:27:20 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Internal Server Error while reverting spam In-Reply-To: <20184.12605.7226.162410@montanaro.dyndns.org> References: <20111130144114.7841F21093B4@montanaro.dyndns.org> <20184.12605.7226.162410@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <201112020927.20527.paul@boddie.org.uk> On Friday 02 December 2011 03:00:29 skip at pobox.com wrote: > anatoly> And it could be a little easier to type > wiki.python.org/MelbournePUG if mysterious somebody anatoly> could adjust > web-server configuration accordingly. > > There's another layer in the URL which distinguishes the Python and Jython > wikis. At least there used to be. Now I see the selector page briefly, > then it redirects me to the last page I was viewing on the Python wiki. Yes, I think there was a discussion about this: in principle, it makes sense to eliminate the "/moin" part, and I guess that this was changed. I must admit that I haven't been following this list for some time, so I'm sorry if I'm not up-to-date with what people have been doing. > As a person who monitors both wikis (at least for spam postings, if not > actual content), I'm a little disappointed that I can no longer go to > wiki.python.org then select which wiki I want to dive into. Doesn't wiki.jython.org direct you to the Jython Wiki? Paul From mal at egenix.com Fri Dec 2 10:12:27 2011 From: mal at egenix.com (M.-A. Lemburg) Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:12:27 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Internal Server Error while reverting spam In-Reply-To: <201112020927.20527.paul@boddie.org.uk> References: <20111130144114.7841F21093B4@montanaro.dyndns.org> <20184.12605.7226.162410@montanaro.dyndns.org> <201112020927.20527.paul@boddie.org.uk> Message-ID: <4ED8967B.6080605@egenix.com> Paul Boddie wrote: > On Friday 02 December 2011 03:00:29 skip at pobox.com wrote: >> anatoly> And it could be a little easier to type >> wiki.python.org/MelbournePUG if mysterious somebody anatoly> could adjust >> web-server configuration accordingly. >> >> There's another layer in the URL which distinguishes the Python and Jython >> wikis. At least there used to be. Now I see the selector page briefly, >> then it redirects me to the last page I was viewing on the Python wiki. > > Yes, I think there was a discussion about this: in principle, it makes sense > to eliminate the "/moin" part, and I guess that this was changed. I must > admit that I haven't been following this list for some time, so I'm sorry if > I'm not up-to-date with what people have been doing. The /moin part is still there and AFAIK is needed, since there are several instances of moin running on the wiki.python.org domain: * Python wiki * Jython wiki * PSF wiki and perhaps more. >> As a person who monitors both wikis (at least for spam postings, if not >> actual content), I'm a little disappointed that I can no longer go to >> wiki.python.org then select which wiki I want to dive into. Hmm, I still get the list (without the PSF wiki) as usual. Perhaps the change was reverted ? > Doesn't wiki.jython.org direct you to the Jython Wiki? -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Dec 02 2011) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ From sheep at sheep.art.pl Fri Dec 2 10:55:35 2011 From: sheep at sheep.art.pl (Radomir Dopieralski) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 10:55:35 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Internal Server Error while reverting spam In-Reply-To: <4ED8967B.6080605@egenix.com> References: <20111130144114.7841F21093B4@montanaro.dyndns.org> <20184.12605.7226.162410@montanaro.dyndns.org> <201112020927.20527.paul@boddie.org.uk> <4ED8967B.6080605@egenix.com> Message-ID: On Dec 2, 2011 10:12 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > > Paul Boddie wrote: > > On Friday 02 December 2011 03:00:29 skip at pobox.com wrote: > >> anatoly> And it could be a little easier to type > >> wiki.python.org/MelbournePUG if mysterious somebody anatoly> could adjust > >> web-server configuration accordingly. > >> > >> There's another layer in the URL which distinguishes the Python and Jython > >> wikis. At least there used to be. Now I see the selector page briefly, > >> then it redirects me to the last page I was viewing on the Python wiki. > > > > Yes, I think there was a discussion about this: in principle, it makes sense > > to eliminate the "/moin" part, and I guess that this was changed. I must > > admit that I haven't been following this list for some time, so I'm sorry if > > I'm not up-to-date with what people have been doing. > > The /moin part is still there and AFAIK is needed, since there are > several instances of moin running on the wiki.python.org domain: > > * Python wiki > * Jython wiki > * PSF wiki > > and perhaps more. That's not a problem, those urls can be made to work just fine as exceptions. I can write apropriate rules if there is a decission to make the change. > >> As a person who monitors both wikis (at least for spam postings, if not > >> actual content), I'm a little disappointed that I can no longer go to > >> wiki.python.org then select which wiki I want to dive into. > > Hmm, I still get the list (without the PSF wiki) as usual. Perhaps > the change was reverted ? > > > Doesn't wiki.jython.org direct you to the Jython Wiki? > > -- > Marc-Andre Lemburg > eGenix.com > > Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Dec 02 2011) > >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ > >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ > >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::: > > > eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 > D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg > Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 > http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ > _______________________________________________ > pydotorg-www mailing list > pydotorg-www at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mal at egenix.com Fri Dec 2 11:07:51 2011 From: mal at egenix.com (M.-A. Lemburg) Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 11:07:51 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Internal Server Error while reverting spam In-Reply-To: References: <20111130144114.7841F21093B4@montanaro.dyndns.org> <20184.12605.7226.162410@montanaro.dyndns.org> <201112020927.20527.paul@boddie.org.uk> <4ED8967B.6080605@egenix.com> Message-ID: <4ED8A377.5080900@egenix.com> Radomir Dopieralski wrote: > On Dec 2, 2011 10:12 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: >> >> Paul Boddie wrote: >>> On Friday 02 December 2011 03:00:29 skip at pobox.com wrote: >>>> anatoly> And it could be a little easier to type >>>> wiki.python.org/MelbournePUG if mysterious somebody anatoly> could > adjust >>>> web-server configuration accordingly. >>>> >>>> There's another layer in the URL which distinguishes the Python and > Jython >>>> wikis. At least there used to be. Now I see the selector page > briefly, >>>> then it redirects me to the last page I was viewing on the Python wiki. >>> >>> Yes, I think there was a discussion about this: in principle, it makes > sense >>> to eliminate the "/moin" part, and I guess that this was changed. I must >>> admit that I haven't been following this list for some time, so I'm > sorry if >>> I'm not up-to-date with what people have been doing. >> >> The /moin part is still there and AFAIK is needed, since there are >> several instances of moin running on the wiki.python.org domain: >> >> * Python wiki >> * Jython wiki >> * PSF wiki >> >> and perhaps more. > > That's not a problem, those urls can be made to work just fine as > exceptions. I can write apropriate rules if there is a decission to make > the change. Could you elaborate a bit ? What are those "exceptions" ? -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Dec 02 2011) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ From sheep at sheep.art.pl Fri Dec 2 11:13:10 2011 From: sheep at sheep.art.pl (Radomir Dopieralski) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 11:13:10 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Internal Server Error while reverting spam In-Reply-To: <4ED8A377.5080900@egenix.com> References: <20111130144114.7841F21093B4@montanaro.dyndns.org> <20184.12605.7226.162410@montanaro.dyndns.org> <201112020927.20527.paul@boddie.org.uk> <4ED8967B.6080605@egenix.com> <4ED8A377.5080900@egenix.com> Message-ID: On Dec 2, 2011 11:07 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > > Radomir Dopieralski wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2011 10:12 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > >> > >> Paul Boddie wrote: > >>> On Friday 02 December 2011 03:00:29 skip at pobox.com wrote: > >>>> anatoly> And it could be a little easier to type > >>>> wiki.python.org/MelbournePUG if mysterious somebody anatoly> could > > adjust > >>>> web-server configuration accordingly. > >>>> > >>>> There's another layer in the URL which distinguishes the Python and > > Jython > >>>> wikis. At least there used to be. Now I see the selector page > > briefly, > >>>> then it redirects me to the last page I was viewing on the Python wiki. > >>> > >>> Yes, I think there was a discussion about this: in principle, it makes > > sense > >>> to eliminate the "/moin" part, and I guess that this was changed. I must > >>> admit that I haven't been following this list for some time, so I'm > > sorry if > >>> I'm not up-to-date with what people have been doing. > >> > >> The /moin part is still there and AFAIK is needed, since there are > >> several instances of moin running on the wiki.python.org domain: > >> > >> * Python wiki > >> * Jython wiki > >> * PSF wiki > >> > >> and perhaps more. > > > > That's not a problem, those urls can be made to work just fine as > > exceptions. I can write apropriate rules if there is a decission to make > > the change. > > Could you elaborate a bit ? What are those "exceptions" ? It's not a technical term, I meant it literally. Basically you can configure the web server so that the urls of those other wikis lead to the respective applications, while all other urls lead to the default python wiki. I think it doesn't even require rewrite rules, as scriptalias directives are evaluated in order of occurence. We would of course still have a redirect from the old /moin url. > -- > Marc-Andre Lemburg > eGenix.com > > Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Dec 02 2011) > >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ > >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ > >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ > ________________________________________________________________________ > > ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::: > > > eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 > D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg > Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 > http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From skip at pobox.com Sat Dec 3 00:32:52 2011 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 17:32:52 -0600 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Internal Server Error while reverting spam In-Reply-To: <201112020927.20527.paul@boddie.org.uk> References: <20111130144114.7841F21093B4@montanaro.dyndns.org> <20184.12605.7226.162410@montanaro.dyndns.org> <201112020927.20527.paul@boddie.org.uk> Message-ID: <20185.24612.947191.651516@montanaro.dyndns.org> Paul> Doesn't wiki.jython.org direct you to the Jython Wiki? Indeed it does. I didn't know it existed. Thx, Skip From steve at holdenweb.com Sun Dec 4 01:35:06 2011 From: steve at holdenweb.com (Steve Holden) Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 16:35:06 -0800 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) In-Reply-To: <20111126095224.GD25436@charite.de> References: <000e0cdf15ec74b7e304b295ab66@google.com> <20111126095224.GD25436@charite.de> Message-ID: [definitely not urgent] OK, how does this look? And if it looks OK, how come I'm still getting bounced at pythoncraft.com? """ Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.1.0 : Sender address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table (state 14). """ regards Steve (test2)AirHead:freetype-2.4.4 sholden$ dig @8.8.8.8 any holdenweb.com ; <<>> DiG 9.6-ESV-R4-P3 <<>> @8.8.8.8 any holdenweb.com ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6226 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 11, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;holdenweb.com. IN ANY ;; ANSWER SECTION: holdenweb.com. 899 IN NS a.ns.zerigo.net. holdenweb.com. 899 IN MX 10 alt2.aspmx.l.google.com. holdenweb.com. 899 IN MX 10 alt1.aspmx.l.google.com. holdenweb.com. 899 IN NS c.ns.zerigo.net. holdenweb.com. 899 IN MX 10 aspmx.l.google.com. holdenweb.com. 899 IN NS b.ns.zerigo.net. holdenweb.com. 899 IN NS f.ns.zerigo.net. holdenweb.com. 899 IN NS d.ns.zerigo.net. holdenweb.com. 899 IN A 174.120.139.138 holdenweb.com. 899 IN SOA a.ns.zerigo.net. hostmaster.zerigo.com. 1322302164 10800 3600 604800 900 holdenweb.com. 899 IN NS e.ns.zerigo.net. ;; Query time: 419 msec ;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8) ;; WHEN: Sat Dec 3 16:30:12 2011 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 283 On Nov 26, 2011, at 1:52 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * Steve Holden : > >> Still happening. But when you read the error message that's not >> surprising, because it seems to be an SMTP server setup issue. >> pythoncraft.com's SMTP server's Postscript doesn't know who "aahz" is. > > Yes, but the MX setup for holdenweb.com is also broken: > > Host/Domain: holdenweb.com > MX: aspmx.l.google.com(10) > MX: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com(20) > MX: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com(20) > MX: asmpx3.googlemail.com(50) > asmpx3.googlemail.com NXDOMAIN > MX: asmpx5.googlemail.com(50) > asmpx5.googlemail.com NXDOMAIN > > Remove the two non existing MX records (NXDOMAIN) > > >>> aahz at pythoncraft.com > > That one seems to work again. > > -- > Ralf Hildebrandt > Gesch?ftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk > Charit? - Universit?tsmedizin Berlin > Campus Benjamin Franklin > Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin > Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 > ralf.hildebrandt at charite.de | http://www.charite.de > -- Steve Holden steve at holdenweb.com, Holden Web, LLC http://holdenweb.com/ Python classes (and much more) through the web http://oreillyschool.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From martin at v.loewis.de Sun Dec 4 10:45:07 2011 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 10:45:07 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) In-Reply-To: References: <000e0cdf15ec74b7e304b295ab66@google.com> <20111126095224.GD25436@charite.de> Message-ID: <4EDB4123.6030104@v.loewis.de> > OK, how does this look? And if it looks OK, how come I'm still getting > bounced at pythoncraft.com ? > > """ > Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the > recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for > further information about the cause of this error. The error that the > other server returned was: 550 550 5.1.0 >: Sender address rejected: User unknown in > virtual alias table (state 14). > """ I'm not a postfix expert, but my interpretation is that pythoncraft.com tried to generate an automatic reply, and that this automatic reply couldn't be sent because of a misconfiguration on pythoncraft.com. I suggest that you follow the advise and contact pythoncraft.com's postmaster. Regards, Martin From Ralf.Hildebrandt at charite.de Sun Dec 4 10:57:40 2011 From: Ralf.Hildebrandt at charite.de (Ralf Hildebrandt) Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 10:57:40 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) In-Reply-To: References: <000e0cdf15ec74b7e304b295ab66@google.com> <20111126095224.GD25436@charite.de> Message-ID: <20111204095740.GB20872@charite.de> * Steve Holden : > [definitely not urgent] > > OK, how does this look? And if it looks OK, how come I'm still getting bounced at pythoncraft.com? > > """ Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver > your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend > contacting the other email provider for further information about the > cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 > 550 5.1.0 : Sender address rejected: User unknown > in virtual alias table (state 14). """ This looks like the recipient domain does sender address verification and the mailserver for the sender reported "User unknown in virtual alias table" (and maybe that data is old, but cached) steve at holdenweb.com is definitely being valid ( :) ) and (I just tested this) being accepted by every MX host. Thus I'm assuming that the MXes for pythoncraft.com (which are using postfix) cached the negative verification result. The default settings are: address_verify_negative_cache = yes address_verify_negative_expire_time = 3d address_verify_negative_refresh_time = 3h Meaning that it may take up to 3 days for the wrong data to expire. How old is that report (I took the weekend off :) ) -- Ralf Hildebrandt Gesch?ftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk Charit? - Universit?tsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin Hindenburgdamm 30 | D-12203 Berlin Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962 ralf.hildebrandt at charite.de | http://www.charite.de From michael at voidspace.org.uk Sat Dec 10 21:06:44 2011 From: michael at voidspace.org.uk (Michael Foord) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 20:06:44 +0000 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Fwd: Python 3 Poll In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4EE3BBD4.1050105@voidspace.org.uk> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Python 3 Poll Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:12:47 +0100 From: Joaquin Abian To: webmaster at python.org Dear Sirs, Python 3 Poll is contributing negatively to the perception of the status of py3k. Many of the packages listed already have py3k versions available in windows (matplotlib, PIL, pygame, ipython, pyramid). Some are already official versions like ipython or pyramid, some are available as binaries in Gohlke repository. It is really impresive the number of people you can find arguing that the fact preventing them to swicht to py3k is the lack of ports of libraries such as numpy, scipy and matplotlib... !! all of them with binary installers for py3k available months ago. Is it possible to refresh the list or the interaction with people accesing the voting system to prevent people voting to already available libraries. Could be libraries removed from the list as soon as they become available ? Thanks for your attention Joaquin Abian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From aahz at pythoncraft.com Sat Dec 10 22:02:05 2011 From: aahz at pythoncraft.com (Aahz) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:02:05 -0800 Subject: [pydotorg-www] FWD: Python 3 Poll Message-ID: <20111210210205.GB26910@panix.com> Anyone know who's maintaining the poll? If not, I'm going to remove it from the front page. ----- Forwarded message from Joaquin Abian ----- > Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:12:47 +0100 > From: Joaquin Abian > To: webmaster at python.org > Subject: Python 3 Poll > > Dear Sirs, > > Python 3 Poll is contributing negatively to the perception of the status of > py3k. > > Many of the packages listed already have py3k versions available in windows > (matplotlib, PIL, pygame, ipython, pyramid). Some are already official > versions like ipython or pyramid, some are available as binaries in Gohlke > repository. > > It is really impresive the number of people you can find arguing that the > fact preventing them to swicht to py3k is the lack of ports of libraries > such as numpy, scipy and matplotlib... !! all of them with binary > installers for py3k available months ago. > > Is it possible to refresh the list or the interaction with people accesing > the voting system to prevent people voting to already available libraries. > Could be libraries removed from the list as soon as they become available ? > > Thanks for your attention > > Joaquin Abian ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "....Normal is what cuts off your sixth finger and your tail..." --Siobhan From skip at pobox.com Sat Dec 10 22:29:01 2011 From: skip at pobox.com (Skip Montanaro) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:29:01 -0600 Subject: [pydotorg-www] FWD: Python 3 Poll In-Reply-To: <20111210210205.GB26910@panix.com> References: <20111210210205.GB26910@panix.com> Message-ID: > Anyone know who's maintaining the poll? ?If not, I'm going to remove it > from the front page. Ideally, the best route would be to recognize which packages have already been ported to Python 3, then when people ask for such packages, tell them, "The authors of package X borrowed Guido's time machine. It's already available for Python 3. Would you like to download Python 3 now?" Skip From noah at coderanger.net Sat Dec 10 22:27:19 2011 From: noah at coderanger.net (Noah Kantrowitz) Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 13:27:19 -0800 Subject: [pydotorg-www] FWD: Python 3 Poll In-Reply-To: <20111210210205.GB26910@panix.com> References: <20111210210205.GB26910@panix.com> Message-ID: <891BFE5C-FAE3-4FAE-8F19-E750A2CF089C@coderanger.net> I think that was Brett's baby. --Noah On Dec 10, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Aahz wrote: > Anyone know who's maintaining the poll? If not, I'm going to remove it > from the front page. > > ----- Forwarded message from Joaquin Abian ----- > >> Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 19:12:47 +0100 >> From: Joaquin Abian >> To: webmaster at python.org >> Subject: Python 3 Poll >> >> Dear Sirs, >> >> Python 3 Poll is contributing negatively to the perception of the status of >> py3k. >> >> Many of the packages listed already have py3k versions available in windows >> (matplotlib, PIL, pygame, ipython, pyramid). Some are already official >> versions like ipython or pyramid, some are available as binaries in Gohlke >> repository. >> >> It is really impresive the number of people you can find arguing that the >> fact preventing them to swicht to py3k is the lack of ports of libraries >> such as numpy, scipy and matplotlib... !! all of them with binary >> installers for py3k available months ago. >> >> Is it possible to refresh the list or the interaction with people accesing >> the voting system to prevent people voting to already available libraries. >> Could be libraries removed from the list as soon as they become available ? >> >> Thanks for your attention >> >> Joaquin Abian > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > -- > Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ > > "....Normal is what cuts off your sixth finger and your tail..." --Siobhan > _______________________________________________ > pydotorg-www mailing list > pydotorg-www at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 163 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: From martin at v.loewis.de Mon Dec 12 22:47:23 2011 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:47:23 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Fwd: Python 3 Poll In-Reply-To: <4EE3BBD4.1050105@voidspace.org.uk> References: <4EE3BBD4.1050105@voidspace.org.uk> Message-ID: <4EE6766B.3080302@v.loewis.de> > Many of the packages listed already have py3k versions available in > windows (matplotlib, PIL, pygame, ipython, pyramid). Some are already > official versions like ipython or pyramid, some are available as > binaries in Gohlke repository. Dear Joaquin, We are certainly interested in removing those packages from the poll which have been ported to Python 3. To that effect, I have activated a procedure which checks regularly for packages that use the Python :: 3 trove classifier. For the others in your list, we need to consider them individually, and then remove them manually. For Pygame, it appears that the maintainers only have old releases on PyPI, but not the most recent one, so I added it manually. For ipython, I have also removed it from the list, even though it probably would be better if ipython used the trove classifier. For the packages that don't have released their Python 3 versions yet, I'd rather keep the status quo, until they actually make a release that supports Python 3. If you think more packages need reconsideration, please let us know. Regards, Martin From techtonik at gmail.com Tue Dec 13 14:00:48 2011 From: techtonik at gmail.com (anatoly techtonik) Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:00:48 +0300 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org (Was: Internal Server Error while reverting spam) Message-ID: On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2011 11:07 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > > > > Radomir Dopieralski wrote: > > > On Dec 2, 2011 10:12 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: > > >> > > >> Paul Boddie wrote: > > >>> On Friday 02 December 2011 03:00:29 skip at pobox.com wrote: > > >>>> anatoly> And it could be a little easier to type > > >>>> wiki.python.org/MelbournePUG if mysterious somebody > > >>>> anatoly> could adjust web-server configuration accordingly. > > >>>> > > >>>> There's another layer in the URL which distinguishes the Python and > > >>>> Jython wikis. At least there used to be. Now I see the selector > page > > >>>> briefly, then it redirects me to the last page I was viewing on the > > >>>> Python wiki. > > >>> > > >>> Yes, I think there was a discussion about this: in principle, it > makes > > >>> sense to eliminate the "/moin" part, and I guess that this was > changed. > > >>> I must admit that I haven't been following this list for some time, > so I'm > > >>> sorry if I'm not up-to-date with what people have been doing. > > >> > > >> The /moin part is still there and AFAIK is needed, since there are > > >> several instances of moin running on the wiki.python.org domain: > > >> > > >> * Python wiki > > >> * Jython wiki > > >> * PSF wiki > > >> > > >> and perhaps more. > > > > > > That's not a problem, those urls can be made to work just fine as > > > exceptions. I can write apropriate rules if there is a decission to > make > > > the change. > > > > Could you elaborate a bit ? What are those "exceptions" ? > > It's not a technical term, I meant it literally. Basically you can > configure the web server so that the urls of those other wikis lead to the > respective applications, while all other urls lead to the default python > wiki. I think it doesn't even require rewrite rules, as scriptalias > directives are evaluated in order of occurence. We would of course still > have a redirect from the old /moin url. > If there are no objections, I would say - Radomir, go for it. =) To summarize what do we want to do and how it will behave after the migration: * wiki.python.org/PageName - is a new shorter way of accessing Python knowledge base * wiki.jython.org/PageName - is a new shorter way to access Jython pages * wiki.python.org/moin/(.*)$ - will be a permanent redirect to wiki.python.org/\1 to save external links from breaking * wiki.python.org/jython/(.*)$ - the same to wiki.jython.org/\1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From martin at v.loewis.de Sun Dec 18 22:53:46 2011 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?ISO-8859-15?Q?=22Martin_v=2E_L=F6wis=22?=) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 22:53:46 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] PyPI migrated to dinsdale Message-ID: <4EEE60EA.2000705@v.loewis.de> It appears that ximinez' eth0 breaks under heavy load; I have now migrated PyPI to dinsdale as a temporary measure. It may be that I missed copying some files, please forward reports to me or fix the issue yourself (in which case I'd still like to know). Regards, Martin From mal at egenix.com Mon Dec 19 11:01:56 2011 From: mal at egenix.com (M.-A. Lemburg) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:01:56 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org (Was: Internal Server Error while reverting spam) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4EEF0B94.9020407@egenix.com> anatoly techtonik wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: >> >> On Dec 2, 2011 11:07 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: >>> >>> Radomir Dopieralski wrote: >>>> On Dec 2, 2011 10:12 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Paul Boddie wrote: >>>>>> On Friday 02 December 2011 03:00:29 skip at pobox.com wrote: >>>>>>> anatoly> And it could be a little easier to type >>>>>>> wiki.python.org/MelbournePUG if mysterious somebody >>>>>>> anatoly> could adjust web-server configuration accordingly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There's another layer in the URL which distinguishes the Python and >>>>>>> Jython wikis. At least there used to be. Now I see the selector >> page >>>>>>> briefly, then it redirects me to the last page I was viewing on the >>>>>>> Python wiki. >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, I think there was a discussion about this: in principle, it >> makes >>>>>> sense to eliminate the "/moin" part, and I guess that this was >> changed. >>>>>> I must admit that I haven't been following this list for some time, >> so I'm >>>>>> sorry if I'm not up-to-date with what people have been doing. >>>>> >>>>> The /moin part is still there and AFAIK is needed, since there are >>>>> several instances of moin running on the wiki.python.org domain: >>>>> >>>>> * Python wiki >>>>> * Jython wiki >>>>> * PSF wiki >>>>> >>>>> and perhaps more. >>>> >>>> That's not a problem, those urls can be made to work just fine as >>>> exceptions. I can write apropriate rules if there is a decission to >> make >>>> the change. >>> >>> Could you elaborate a bit ? What are those "exceptions" ? >> >> It's not a technical term, I meant it literally. Basically you can >> configure the web server so that the urls of those other wikis lead to the >> respective applications, while all other urls lead to the default python >> wiki. I think it doesn't even require rewrite rules, as scriptalias >> directives are evaluated in order of occurence. We would of course still >> have a redirect from the old /moin url. >> > > If there are no objections, I would say - Radomir, go for it. =) > To summarize what do we want to do and how it will behave after the > migration: > > * wiki.python.org/PageName - is a new shorter way of accessing Python > knowledge base > * wiki.jython.org/PageName - is a new shorter way to access Jython pages > * wiki.python.org/moin/(.*)$ - will be a permanent redirect to > wiki.python.org/\1 to save external links from breaking > * wiki.python.org/jython/(.*)$ - the same to wiki.jython.org/\1 I don't think this will technically work with MoinMoin, since it needs the URL prefix to distinguish between the wiki instances in a farm installation. We could have a redirect from anything not a wiki instance prefix to wiki.python.org/moin/\1, but the wiki pages themselves would still need to use the /moin/ prefix. BTW: What's so bad about the prefix advertising the use of MoinMoin for the Python.org wiki ? -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Dec 19 2011) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ From techtonik at gmail.com Mon Dec 19 18:33:14 2011 From: techtonik at gmail.com (anatoly techtonik) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:33:14 +0300 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org (Was: Internal Server Error while reverting spam) In-Reply-To: <4EEF0B94.9020407@egenix.com> References: <4EEF0B94.9020407@egenix.com> Message-ID: The same stuff that makes you type 'hg' unstead of 'mercurial' - not everybody us using mouse to click through aiki pages. And as as a person who actually uses wiki and contribute to it, I find it inconvenient. On Dec 19, 2011 1:01 PM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: anatoly techtonik wrote: > On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Radomir Dopieralski w... I don't think this will technically work with MoinMoin, since it needs the URL prefix to distinguish between the wiki instances in a farm installation. We could have a redirect from anything not a wiki instance prefix to wiki.python.org/moin/\1, but the wiki pages themselves would still need to use the /moin/ prefix. BTW: What's so bad about the prefix advertising the use of MoinMoin for the Python.org wiki ? -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Dec 19 2011) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sheep at sheep.art.pl Mon Dec 19 18:49:26 2011 From: sheep at sheep.art.pl (Radomir Dopieralski) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:49:26 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org (Was: Internal Server Error while reverting spam) In-Reply-To: <4EEF0B94.9020407@egenix.com> References: <4EEF0B94.9020407@egenix.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:01, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > anatoly techtonik wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: >>> >>> ?On Dec 2, 2011 11:07 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: >>>> >>>> Radomir Dopieralski wrote: >>>>> On Dec 2, 2011 10:12 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Paul Boddie wrote: >>>>>>> On Friday 02 December 2011 03:00:29 skip at pobox.com wrote: >>>>>>>> ? ? anatoly> And it could be a little easier to type >>>>>>>> wiki.python.org/MelbournePUG if mysterious somebody >>>>>>>> ? ? anatoly> could adjust web-server configuration accordingly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There's another layer in the URL which distinguishes the Python and >>>>>>>> Jython wikis. ?At least there used to be. ?Now I see the selector >>> page >>>>>>>> briefly, then it redirects me to the last page I was viewing on the >>>>>>>> Python wiki. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, I think there was a discussion about this: in principle, it >>> makes >>>>>>> sense to eliminate the "/moin" part, and I guess that this was >>> changed. >>>>>>> I must admit that I haven't been following this list for some time, >>> so I'm >>>>>>> sorry if I'm not up-to-date with what people have been doing. >>>>>> >>>>>> The /moin part is still there and AFAIK is needed, since there are >>>>>> several instances of moin running on the wiki.python.org domain: >>>>>> >>>>>> ?* Python wiki >>>>>> ?* Jython ?wiki >>>>>> ?* PSF wiki >>>>>> >>>>>> and perhaps more. >>>>> >>>>> That's not a problem, those urls can be made to work just fine as >>>>> exceptions. I can write apropriate rules if there is a decission to >>> make >>>>> the change. >>>> >>>> Could you elaborate a bit ? What are those "exceptions" ? >>> >>> It's not a technical term, I meant it literally. Basically you can >>> configure the web server so that the urls of those other wikis lead to the >>> respective applications, while all other urls lead to the default python >>> wiki. I think it doesn't even require rewrite rules, as scriptalias >>> directives are evaluated in order of occurence. We would of course still >>> have a redirect from the old /moin url. >>> >> >> If there are no objections, I would say - Radomir, go for it. =) >> To summarize what do we want to do and how it will behave after the >> migration: >> >> ?* wiki.python.org/PageName - is a new shorter way of accessing Python >> knowledge base >> ?* wiki.jython.org/PageName - is a new shorter way to access Jython pages >> ?* wiki.python.org/moin/(.*)$ - will be a permanent redirect to >> wiki.python.org/\1 to save external links from breaking >> ?* wiki.python.org/jython/(.*)$ - the same to ?wiki.jython.org/\1 > > I don't think this will technically work with MoinMoin, since it > needs the URL prefix to distinguish between the wiki instances > in a farm installation. > > We could have a redirect from anything not a wiki instance > prefix to wiki.python.org/moin/\1, but the wiki pages themselves > would still need to use the /moin/ prefix. I'm sorry, but I must protest here. As one of the core developers of MoinMoin I have never heard about such a limitation -- perhaps in was there in some older versions of MoinMoin, from before I joined. In fact, the wikis at *.moinmo.in itself are running as a farm, as far as I know, and they are all top-level wikis. The regular expressions in farmconfig can match the domain names just fine. Even if there was such a limitation, it would be very easy to work around with Apache's rewrite rules. There are no technical problems preventing us from using the setup that Anatoly described, and I will be glad to configure the wikis once an agreement is reached. > BTW: What's so bad about the prefix advertising the use of > MoinMoin for the Python.org wiki ? Personally I don't mind it. I'm just trying to say that there are no technical requirements for it. -- Radomir Dopieralski, http://sheep.art.pl From mal at egenix.com Mon Dec 19 20:01:48 2011 From: mal at egenix.com (M.-A. Lemburg) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:01:48 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org (Was: Internal Server Error while reverting spam) In-Reply-To: References: <4EEF0B94.9020407@egenix.com> Message-ID: <4EEF8A1C.1010602@egenix.com> Radomir Dopieralski wrote: > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:01, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> anatoly techtonik wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: >>>> >>>> On Dec 2, 2011 11:07 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Radomir Dopieralski wrote: >>>>>> On Dec 2, 2011 10:12 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Paul Boddie wrote: >>>>>>>> On Friday 02 December 2011 03:00:29 skip at pobox.com wrote: >>>>>>>>> anatoly> And it could be a little easier to type >>>>>>>>> wiki.python.org/MelbournePUG if mysterious somebody >>>>>>>>> anatoly> could adjust web-server configuration accordingly. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> There's another layer in the URL which distinguishes the Python and >>>>>>>>> Jython wikis. At least there used to be. Now I see the selector >>>> page >>>>>>>>> briefly, then it redirects me to the last page I was viewing on the >>>>>>>>> Python wiki. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes, I think there was a discussion about this: in principle, it >>>> makes >>>>>>>> sense to eliminate the "/moin" part, and I guess that this was >>>> changed. >>>>>>>> I must admit that I haven't been following this list for some time, >>>> so I'm >>>>>>>> sorry if I'm not up-to-date with what people have been doing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The /moin part is still there and AFAIK is needed, since there are >>>>>>> several instances of moin running on the wiki.python.org domain: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> * Python wiki >>>>>>> * Jython wiki >>>>>>> * PSF wiki >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and perhaps more. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's not a problem, those urls can be made to work just fine as >>>>>> exceptions. I can write apropriate rules if there is a decission to >>>> make >>>>>> the change. >>>>> >>>>> Could you elaborate a bit ? What are those "exceptions" ? >>>> >>>> It's not a technical term, I meant it literally. Basically you can >>>> configure the web server so that the urls of those other wikis lead to the >>>> respective applications, while all other urls lead to the default python >>>> wiki. I think it doesn't even require rewrite rules, as scriptalias >>>> directives are evaluated in order of occurence. We would of course still >>>> have a redirect from the old /moin url. >>>> >>> >>> If there are no objections, I would say - Radomir, go for it. =) >>> To summarize what do we want to do and how it will behave after the >>> migration: >>> >>> * wiki.python.org/PageName - is a new shorter way of accessing Python >>> knowledge base >>> * wiki.jython.org/PageName - is a new shorter way to access Jython pages >>> * wiki.python.org/moin/(.*)$ - will be a permanent redirect to >>> wiki.python.org/\1 to save external links from breaking >>> * wiki.python.org/jython/(.*)$ - the same to wiki.jython.org/\1 >> >> I don't think this will technically work with MoinMoin, since it >> needs the URL prefix to distinguish between the wiki instances >> in a farm installation. >> >> We could have a redirect from anything not a wiki instance >> prefix to wiki.python.org/moin/\1, but the wiki pages themselves >> would still need to use the /moin/ prefix. > > I'm sorry, but I must protest here. As one of the core developers of > MoinMoin I have never heard about such a limitation -- perhaps in was > there in some older versions of MoinMoin, from before I joined. In > fact, the wikis at *.moinmo.in itself are running as a farm, as far as > I know, and they are all top-level wikis. The regular expressions in > farmconfig can match the domain names just fine. Even if there was > such a limitation, it would be very easy to work around with Apache's > rewrite rules. There are no technical problems preventing us from > using the setup that Anatoly described, and I will be glad to > configure the wikis once an agreement is reached. Perhaps I wasn't clear: The farmconfig.py needs to be able to distinguish between different wiki instances and since we have at least three such instances running on wiki.python.org I don't see how you could have a regular expression separate the three if the /moin/ instance is going to be moved to top-level. You could need to separate them by domain name, but then we'd need new domain names and Apache setups for the PSF wiki and possibly other instances running on the server. >> BTW: What's so bad about the prefix advertising the use of >> MoinMoin for the Python.org wiki ? > > Personally I don't mind it. I'm just trying to say that there are no > technical requirements for it. Ok. FWIW, I don't see an issue here, so don't think any action is necessary. 5 extra characters to type don't warrant the extra maintenance effort, IMHO. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Dec 19 2011) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ From sheep at sheep.art.pl Mon Dec 19 20:32:08 2011 From: sheep at sheep.art.pl (Radomir Dopieralski) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:32:08 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org (Was: Internal Server Error while reverting spam) In-Reply-To: <4EEF8A1C.1010602@egenix.com> References: <4EEF0B94.9020407@egenix.com> <4EEF8A1C.1010602@egenix.com> Message-ID: On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 20:01, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Radomir Dopieralski wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:01, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >>> anatoly techtonik wrote: >>>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Radomir Dopieralski wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ?On Dec 2, 2011 11:07 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Radomir Dopieralski wrote: >>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2011 10:12 AM, "M.-A. Lemburg" wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Paul Boddie wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Friday 02 December 2011 03:00:29 skip at pobox.com wrote: >>>>>>>>>> ? ? anatoly> And it could be a little easier to type >>>>>>>>>> wiki.python.org/MelbournePUG if mysterious somebody >>>>>>>>>> ? ? anatoly> could adjust web-server configuration accordingly. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There's another layer in the URL which distinguishes the Python and >>>>>>>>>> Jython wikis. ?At least there used to be. ?Now I see the selector >>>>> page >>>>>>>>>> briefly, then it redirects me to the last page I was viewing on the >>>>>>>>>> Python wiki. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, I think there was a discussion about this: in principle, it >>>>> makes >>>>>>>>> sense to eliminate the "/moin" part, and I guess that this was >>>>> changed. >>>>>>>>> I must admit that I haven't been following this list for some time, >>>>> so I'm >>>>>>>>> sorry if I'm not up-to-date with what people have been doing. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The /moin part is still there and AFAIK is needed, since there are >>>>>>>> several instances of moin running on the wiki.python.org domain: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ?* Python wiki >>>>>>>> ?* Jython ?wiki >>>>>>>> ?* PSF wiki >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and perhaps more. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's not a problem, those urls can be made to work just fine as >>>>>>> exceptions. I can write apropriate rules if there is a decission to >>>>> make >>>>>>> the change. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you elaborate a bit ? What are those "exceptions" ? >>>>> >>>>> It's not a technical term, I meant it literally. Basically you can >>>>> configure the web server so that the urls of those other wikis lead to the >>>>> respective applications, while all other urls lead to the default python >>>>> wiki. I think it doesn't even require rewrite rules, as scriptalias >>>>> directives are evaluated in order of occurence. We would of course still >>>>> have a redirect from the old /moin url. >>>>> >>>> >>>> If there are no objections, I would say - Radomir, go for it. =) >>>> To summarize what do we want to do and how it will behave after the >>>> migration: >>>> >>>> ?* wiki.python.org/PageName - is a new shorter way of accessing Python >>>> knowledge base >>>> ?* wiki.jython.org/PageName - is a new shorter way to access Jython pages >>>> ?* wiki.python.org/moin/(.*)$ - will be a permanent redirect to >>>> wiki.python.org/\1 to save external links from breaking >>>> ?* wiki.python.org/jython/(.*)$ - the same to ?wiki.jython.org/\1 >>> >>> I don't think this will technically work with MoinMoin, since it >>> needs the URL prefix to distinguish between the wiki instances >>> in a farm installation. >>> >>> We could have a redirect from anything not a wiki instance >>> prefix to wiki.python.org/moin/\1, but the wiki pages themselves >>> would still need to use the /moin/ prefix. That's not a problem, I can match both on the domain and on the prefix -- and I can treat no prefix as yet another match for the prefix. So, wiki.python.org would lead to the python wiki, wiki.jython.org to the jython wiki, etc. plus there would be redirects from wiki.python.org/moin/* and wiki.python.org/jython/*. >> I'm sorry, but I must protest here. As one of the core developers of >> MoinMoin I have never heard about such a limitation -- perhaps in was >> there in some older versions of MoinMoin, from before I joined. In >> fact, the wikis at *.moinmo.in itself are running as a farm, as far as >> I know, and they are all top-level wikis. The regular expressions in >> farmconfig can match the domain names just fine. Even if there was >> such a limitation, it would be very easy to work around with Apache's >> rewrite rules. There are no technical problems preventing us from >> using the setup that Anatoly described, and I will be glad to >> configure the wikis once an agreement is reached. > > Perhaps I wasn't clear: > > The farmconfig.py needs to be able to distinguish between > different wiki instances and since we have at least three such > instances running on wiki.python.org I don't see how you > could have a regular expression separate the three if > the /moin/ instance is going to be moved to top-level. > > You could need to separate them by domain name, but then > we'd need new domain names and Apache setups for the PSF wiki > and possibly other instances running on the server. > >>> BTW: What's so bad about the prefix advertising the use of >>> MoinMoin for the Python.org wiki ? >> >> Personally I don't mind it. I'm just trying to say that there are no >> technical requirements for it. > > Ok. FWIW, I don't see an issue here, so don't think any action is > necessary. 5 extra characters to type don't warrant the > extra maintenance effort, IMHO. I would do all the work and I don't really mind. -- Radomir Dopieralski, http://sheep.art.pl From martin at v.loewis.de Mon Dec 19 23:41:14 2011 From: martin at v.loewis.de (=?UTF-8?B?Ik1hcnRpbiB2LiBMw7Z3aXMi?=) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:41:14 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org (Was: Internal Server Error while reverting spam) In-Reply-To: References: <4EEF0B94.9020407@egenix.com> <4EEF8A1C.1010602@egenix.com> Message-ID: <4EEFBD8A.2050907@v.loewis.de> > That's not a problem, I can match both on the domain and on the prefix > -- and I can treat no prefix as yet another match for the prefix. > So, wiki.python.org would lead to the python wiki, wiki.jython.org to > the jython wiki, etc. plus there would be redirects from > wiki.python.org/moin/* and wiki.python.org/jython/*. I think what MAL is saying is that you cannot have wiki.python.org/psf point to one wiki, and wiki.python.org/ point to another one. If you could, it would be ambiguous if wiki.python.org/psf/BoardAgenda is a page in the PSF wiki, or in the Python Wiki. I'm not sure whether URL stability has been discussed yet in this thread: it's absolutely necessary that the existing URLs continue to work "forever", since people are linking to them. Making them redirect would be an option if implementable. Regards, Martin From paul at boddie.org.uk Tue Dec 20 01:07:49 2011 From: paul at boddie.org.uk (Paul Boddie) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 01:07:49 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org (Was: Internal Server Error while reverting spam) In-Reply-To: <4EEFBD8A.2050907@v.loewis.de> References: <4EEFBD8A.2050907@v.loewis.de> Message-ID: <201112200107.50280.paul@boddie.org.uk> On Monday 19 December 2011 23:41:14 Martin v. L?wis wrote: > > That's not a problem, I can match both on the domain and on the prefix > > -- and I can treat no prefix as yet another match for the prefix. > > So, wiki.python.org would lead to the python wiki, wiki.jython.org to > > the jython wiki, etc. plus there would be redirects from > > wiki.python.org/moin/* and wiki.python.org/jython/*. > > I think what MAL is saying is that you cannot have wiki.python.org/psf > point to one wiki, and wiki.python.org/ point to another one. If you > could, it would be ambiguous if wiki.python.org/psf/BoardAgenda > is a page in the PSF wiki, or in the Python Wiki. I don't remember the farmconfig limitations, but I'm pretty sure you could get Apache to handle this and point /psf to a specific Wiki instance before any other instance is offered a chance to handle it. > I'm not sure whether URL stability has been discussed yet in this > thread: it's absolutely necessary that the existing URLs continue > to work "forever", since people are linking to them. Making them > redirect would be an option if implementable. I'm also pretty sure that Anatoly mentioned URL stability. I think the simplification would be a reasonable enhancement. Paul From mal at egenix.com Tue Dec 20 09:24:25 2011 From: mal at egenix.com (M.-A. Lemburg) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 09:24:25 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org (Was: Internal Server Error while reverting spam) In-Reply-To: <201112200107.50280.paul@boddie.org.uk> References: <4EEFBD8A.2050907@v.loewis.de> <201112200107.50280.paul@boddie.org.uk> Message-ID: <4EF04639.9020905@egenix.com> Paul Boddie wrote: > On Monday 19 December 2011 23:41:14 Martin v. L?wis wrote: >>> That's not a problem, I can match both on the domain and on the prefix >>> -- and I can treat no prefix as yet another match for the prefix. >>> So, wiki.python.org would lead to the python wiki, wiki.jython.org to >>> the jython wiki, etc. plus there would be redirects from >>> wiki.python.org/moin/* and wiki.python.org/jython/*. >> >> I think what MAL is saying is that you cannot have wiki.python.org/psf >> point to one wiki, and wiki.python.org/ point to another one. If you >> could, it would be ambiguous if wiki.python.org/psf/BoardAgenda >> is a page in the PSF wiki, or in the Python Wiki. > > I don't remember the farmconfig limitations, but I'm pretty sure you could get > Apache to handle this and point /psf to a specific Wiki instance before any > other instance is offered a chance to handle it. > >> I'm not sure whether URL stability has been discussed yet in this >> thread: it's absolutely necessary that the existing URLs continue >> to work "forever", since people are linking to them. Making them >> redirect would be an option if implementable. > > I'm also pretty sure that Anatoly mentioned URL stability. I think the > simplification would be a reasonable enhancement. Why not reverse this and redirect from the wiki.python.org/PageName to wiki.python.org/moin/PageName for all page names that don't start with (moin/|psf/|jython/) ? That way you get your shortened URLs, but don't have to change the way MoinMoin is configured or play with domain names and new Apache virtual server setups. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Dec 20 2011) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ From techtonik at gmail.com Tue Dec 20 13:02:42 2011 From: techtonik at gmail.com (anatoly techtonik) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:02:42 +0300 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org (Was: Internal Server Error while reverting spam) In-Reply-To: <4EF04639.9020905@egenix.com> References: <4EEFBD8A.2050907@v.loewis.de> <201112200107.50280.paul@boddie.org.uk> <4EF04639.9020905@egenix.com> Message-ID: On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:24 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Paul Boddie wrote: > > On Monday 19 December 2011 23:41:14 Martin v. L?wis wrote: > >>> That's not a problem, I can match both on the domain and on the prefix > >>> -- and I can treat no prefix as yet another match for the prefix. > >>> So, wiki.python.org would lead to the python wiki, wiki.jython.org to > >>> the jython wiki, etc. plus there would be redirects from > >>> wiki.python.org/moin/* and wiki.python.org/jython/*. > >> > >> I think what MAL is saying is that you cannot have wiki.python.org/psf > >> point to one wiki, and wiki.python.org/ point to another one. If you > >> could, it would be ambiguous if wiki.python.org/psf/BoardAgenda > >> is a page in the PSF wiki, or in the Python Wiki. > > > > I don't remember the farmconfig limitations, but I'm pretty sure you > could get > > Apache to handle this and point /psf to a specific Wiki instance before > any > > other instance is offered a chance to handle it. > > > >> I'm not sure whether URL stability has been discussed yet in this > >> thread: it's absolutely necessary that the existing URLs continue > >> to work "forever", since people are linking to them. Making them > >> redirect would be an option if implementable. > > > > I'm also pretty sure that Anatoly mentioned URL stability. I think the > > simplification would be a reasonable enhancement. > > Why not reverse this and redirect from the wiki.python.org/PageName > to wiki.python.org/moin/PageName for all page names that don't > start with (moin/|psf/|jython/) ? > To me this proposal is like - 'Why have short URLs by default if we can have a long ones?' And I confirm that existing URLs will work "forever" and will redirect to new shorter default page names. That way you get your shortened URLs, but don't have to change the > way MoinMoin is configured or play with domain names and new > Apache virtual server setups. If I was a lazy admin, I'd love this suggestion, but can't agree as a user. If Apache is bothersome to maintain - we can change it to Nginx to make the application more portable. If you're concerned about positive /moin/ advertisement effect, then from a perspective of a Python web developer/admin, the /moin/ prefix looks exactly like an anti-ad. "Why the heck is this prefix doing here if there is already a wiki.* domain namespace?" "Does MoinMoin support domain names mapping?" "Is it a software that is so hard to customize?" So, we remove MoinMoin anti-ad, make wiki URLs simple for users and preserve existing links from breaking. It is a fantastic deal for the small cost of Apache reconfiguration. If you like the pitch, just say "O key" and we'll close it. =) -- anatoly t. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From techtonik at gmail.com Tue Dec 20 15:28:56 2011 From: techtonik at gmail.com (anatoly techtonik) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:28:56 +0300 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Open sourcing 3kpoll code Message-ID: 1. Where is the code for http://python.org/3kpoll ? 2. How about advertising it on the code's page? 3. What is required to make it run on my local machine? I asking, because I want to see stats what most requested packages are already ported and what are not, because http://getpython3.net/ doesn't provide this info. -- anatoly t. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From patcam at python.org Tue Dec 20 21:06:18 2011 From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:06:18 -0500 Subject: [pydotorg-www] PSF- Board Meeting Minutes -Approved- November 2011 - Please Post Online Message-ID: Hello Pydotorg: Could you please post the following "PSF board meeting minutes" online, http://www.python.org/psf/records/board/minutes/ at the usual web locations: please see the attachment for the approved board meeting minutes for November 2011. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks, Pat -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam at python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: Brd Meeting Min-Nov 21- 2011- approved.txt URL: From techtonik at gmail.com Tue Dec 20 22:59:23 2011 From: techtonik at gmail.com (anatoly techtonik) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 23:59:23 +0200 Subject: [pydotorg-www] PSF- Board Meeting Minutes -Approved- November 2011 - Please Post Online In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The funny thing to read about planned pydotorg redesign proposal that had never landed on this list. Another PSF communitcation fail. =) -- anatoly t. On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Pat Campbell wrote: > Hello Pydotorg: > > Could you please post the following "PSF board meeting minutes" online, > http://www.python.org/psf/records/board/minutes/ at the usual web > locations: > please see the attachment for the approved board meeting minutes for > November 2011. > > If you have any questions, please let me know. > > Thanks, > Pat > > > -- > Pat Campbell > PSF Administrator/Secretary > patcam at python.org > > _______________________________________________ > pydotorg-www mailing list > pydotorg-www at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From brian at python.org Tue Dec 20 23:06:15 2011 From: brian at python.org (Brian Curtin) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:06:15 -0600 Subject: [pydotorg-www] PSF- Board Meeting Minutes -Approved- November 2011 - Please Post Online In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 15:59, anatoly techtonik wrote: > The funny thing to read about planned pydotorg redesign proposal that had > never landed on this list. > > Another PSF communitcation fail. =) You are wrong. The "request for proposals" writing *itself* is what's being proposed, and that, for hundreds of reasons, is being handled internally. When the request for proposals document has been solidified, it will absolutely be circulated and communicated in order to receive proposals to complete the work. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From brian at python.org Tue Dec 20 23:32:17 2011 From: brian at python.org (Brian Curtin) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:32:17 -0600 Subject: [pydotorg-www] PSF- Board Meeting Minutes -Approved- November 2011 - Please Post Online In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 14:06, Pat Campbell wrote: > Hello Pydotorg: > > Could you please post the following "PSF board meeting minutes" online, > http://www.python.org/psf/records/board/minutes/ at the usual web > locations: > please see the attachment for the approved board meeting minutes for > November 2011. > > If you have any questions, please let me know. > > Thanks, > Pat Posted: http://www.python.org/psf/records/board/minutes/2011-11-21/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From techtonik at gmail.com Wed Dec 21 00:38:52 2011 From: techtonik at gmail.com (anatoly techtonik) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 01:38:52 +0200 Subject: [pydotorg-www] PSF- Board Meeting Minutes -Approved- November 2011 - Please Post Online In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Brian Curtin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 15:59, anatoly techtonik wrote: > >> The funny thing to read about planned pydotorg redesign proposal that had >> never landed on this list. >> >> Another PSF communitcation fail. =) > > > You are wrong. > > The "request for proposals" writing *itself* is what's being proposed, and > that, for hundreds of reasons, is being handled internally. When the > request for proposals document has been solidified, it will absolutely be > circulated and communicated in order to receive proposals to complete the > work. > Do I understand correctly, there will be only two weeks to gather proposals and feedback? -- anatoly t. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From patcam at python.org Wed Dec 21 01:16:34 2011 From: patcam at python.org (Pat Campbell) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:16:34 -0500 Subject: [pydotorg-www] PSF- Board Meeting Minutes -Approved- November 2011 - Please Post Online In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks a whole bunch Brian. Pat On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Brian Curtin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 14:06, Pat Campbell wrote: > >> Hello Pydotorg: >> >> Could you please post the following "PSF board meeting minutes" online, >> http://www.python.org/psf/records/board/minutes/ at the usual web >> locations: >> please see the attachment for the approved board meeting minutes for >> November 2011. >> >> If you have any questions, please let me know. >> >> Thanks, >> Pat > > > Posted: http://www.python.org/psf/records/board/minutes/2011-11-21/ > -- Pat Campbell PSF Administrator/Secretary patcam at python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From brian at python.org Wed Dec 21 01:28:13 2011 From: brian at python.org (Brian Curtin) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:28:13 -0600 Subject: [pydotorg-www] PSF- Board Meeting Minutes -Approved- November 2011 - Please Post Online In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 17:38, anatoly techtonik wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Brian Curtin wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 15:59, anatoly techtonik >> wrote: >>> >>> The funny thing to read about planned pydotorg redesign proposal that had >>> never landed on this list. >>> >>> Another PSF communitcation fail. =) >> >> >> You are wrong. >> >> The "request for proposals" writing *itself* is what's being proposed, and >> that, for hundreds of reasons, is being handled internally. When the request >> for proposals document has been solidified, it will absolutely be circulated >> and communicated in order to receive proposals to complete the work. > > > Do I understand correctly, there will be only two weeks to gather proposals > and feedback? No. The minutes state that there was a two week call for comments about the draft of the request for proposals. Further questions/discussion of the minutes should be taken somewhere else. From skip at pobox.com Wed Dec 21 17:02:50 2011 From: skip at pobox.com (skip at pobox.com) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:02:50 -0600 (CST) Subject: [pydotorg-www] Help! BlockedUsersGroup page is gone from wiki Message-ID: <20111221160250.3871222E0ADA@montanaro.dyndns.org> I edited the BlockedUsersGroup page to add a spammer login. Moin not-so-helpfully deleted the page when I committed. I tried reverting to a couple different revisions of that page but it kept telling me the page was deleted. About the same time I deleted the spammy page "aweber". That gave me an internal server error. Radomir, are you out there to do a quick triage of this problem? Skip From sheep at sheep.art.pl Wed Dec 21 22:39:24 2011 From: sheep at sheep.art.pl (Radomir Dopieralski) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 22:39:24 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Help! BlockedUsersGroup page is gone from wiki In-Reply-To: <20111221160250.3871222E0ADA@montanaro.dyndns.org> References: <20111221160250.3871222E0ADA@montanaro.dyndns.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 17:02, wrote: > I edited the BlockedUsersGroup page to add a spammer login. ?Moin > not-so-helpfully deleted the page when I committed. ?I tried reverting to a > couple different revisions of that page but it kept telling me the page was > deleted. ?About the same time I deleted the spammy page "aweber". ?That gave > me an internal server error. ?Radomir, are you out there to do a quick > triage of this problem? I looked at the logs, both Apache's and Moin's, and I can't see any trace of those problems. I will do some experiments tomorrow and try to find out what is going on. -- Radomir Dopieralski, http://sheep.art.pl From skip at montanaro.dyndns.org Sat Dec 24 15:31:38 2011 From: skip at montanaro.dyndns.org (Skip Montanaro) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 08:31:38 -0600 (CST) Subject: [pydotorg-www] Asking questions on wiki pages - unproductive? Message-ID: <20111224143138.6A89F22FCD06@montanaro.dyndns.org> Some meme has taken up residence in the wiki which makes some people think that posing a question on a wiki page is a good idea. For instance: http://wiki.python.org/moin/Asking%20for%20Help/%27break%27%20outside%20loop I think it's a bad idea for a couple reasons. First, I don't think very many people who might (want to) answer these questions actually see them. We have much better places for help: python-help, tutor, python-list. Second, I suspect most people who ask questions are probably unfamiliar with how to subscribe to changes to a page so they are notified when an answer is posted. I made a simple edit to the above page. Only Fred Drake and Mats Wichmann were notified of the change. Unless the original poster comes back and checks periodically, he'll never know if the question is answered. How do we (or should we) get people to stop this practice? Skip From techtonik at gmail.com Tue Dec 27 17:12:44 2011 From: techtonik at gmail.com (anatoly techtonik) Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 19:12:44 +0300 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org (Was: Internal Server Error while reverting spam) In-Reply-To: References: <4EEFBD8A.2050907@v.loewis.de> <201112200107.50280.paul@boddie.org.uk> <4EF04639.9020905@egenix.com> Message-ID: 7 days have passed since last message, so I presume there are no more objections to do required configuration changes. Of course, it will be more obvious if people could directly say they are o.k. with it. Should we leave this open for another 7 days? -- anatoly t. On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:02 PM, anatoly techtonik wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:24 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > >> Paul Boddie wrote: >> > On Monday 19 December 2011 23:41:14 Martin v. L?wis wrote: >> >>> That's not a problem, I can match both on the domain and on the prefix >> >>> -- and I can treat no prefix as yet another match for the prefix. >> >>> So, wiki.python.org would lead to the python wiki, wiki.jython.org to >> >>> the jython wiki, etc. plus there would be redirects from >> >>> wiki.python.org/moin/* and wiki.python.org/jython/*. >> >> >> >> I think what MAL is saying is that you cannot have wiki.python.org/psf >> >> point to one wiki, and wiki.python.org/ point to another one. If you >> >> could, it would be ambiguous if wiki.python.org/psf/BoardAgenda >> >> is a page in the PSF wiki, or in the Python Wiki. >> > >> > I don't remember the farmconfig limitations, but I'm pretty sure you >> could get >> > Apache to handle this and point /psf to a specific Wiki instance before >> any >> > other instance is offered a chance to handle it. >> > >> >> I'm not sure whether URL stability has been discussed yet in this >> >> thread: it's absolutely necessary that the existing URLs continue >> >> to work "forever", since people are linking to them. Making them >> >> redirect would be an option if implementable. >> > >> > I'm also pretty sure that Anatoly mentioned URL stability. I think the >> > simplification would be a reasonable enhancement. >> >> Why not reverse this and redirect from the wiki.python.org/PageName >> to wiki.python.org/moin/PageName for all page names that don't >> start with (moin/|psf/|jython/) ? >> > > To me this proposal is like - 'Why have short URLs by default if we can > have a long ones?' > And I confirm that existing URLs will work "forever" and will redirect to > new shorter default page > names. > > That way you get your shortened URLs, but don't have to change the >> way MoinMoin is configured or play with domain names and new >> Apache virtual server setups. > > > If I was a lazy admin, I'd love this suggestion, but can't agree as a > user. If Apache is bothersome to maintain - we can change it to Nginx to > make the application more portable. > > If you're concerned about positive /moin/ advertisement effect, then from > a perspective of a Python web developer/admin, the /moin/ prefix looks > exactly like an anti-ad. "Why the heck is this prefix doing here if there > is already a wiki.* domain namespace?" "Does MoinMoin support domain names > mapping?" "Is it a software that is so hard to customize?" > > So, we remove MoinMoin anti-ad, make wiki URLs simple for users and > preserve existing links from breaking. It is a fantastic deal for the small > cost of Apache reconfiguration. If you like the pitch, just say "O key" and > we'll close it. =) > -- > anatoly t. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mal at egenix.com Wed Dec 28 16:38:01 2011 From: mal at egenix.com (M.-A. Lemburg) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 16:38:01 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org (Was: Internal Server Error while reverting spam) In-Reply-To: References: <4EEFBD8A.2050907@v.loewis.de> <201112200107.50280.paul@boddie.org.uk> <4EF04639.9020905@egenix.com> Message-ID: <4EFB37D9.5000101@egenix.com> anatoly techtonik wrote: > 7 days have passed since last message, so I presume there are no > more objections to do > required configuration changes. Of course, it will be more obvious if > people could directly > say they are o.k. with it. Should we leave this open for another 7 days? I'm still -1 on the change. It only helps people typing the URL and you can get the same effect of saving those 5 letters by having wiki.python.org redirect such URLs to the /moin/ instance, without any complicated URL redirection setup. Browsers don't really care whether the URL is long or short and neither do mice :-) -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Dec 28 2011) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ From brandon at rhodesmill.org Wed Dec 28 19:19:17 2011 From: brandon at rhodesmill.org (Brandon Craig Rhodes) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:19:17 -0500 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org In-Reply-To: <4EFB37D9.5000101@egenix.com> (M.'s message of "Wed, 28 Dec 2011 16:38:01 +0100") References: <4EEFBD8A.2050907@v.loewis.de> <201112200107.50280.paul@boddie.org.uk> <4EF04639.9020905@egenix.com> <4EFB37D9.5000101@egenix.com> Message-ID: <87vcp0v9sq.fsf@asaph.rhodesmill.org> I am: +1 ... on removing the extraneous and noisy URL component. If I thought that unnecessary, implementation-waving cruft and verbosity was tolerable, then I suspect I would not be writing Python in the first place. :) -- Brandon Craig Rhodes brandon at rhodesmill.org http://rhodesmill.org/brandon From g.brandl at gmx.net Wed Dec 28 21:17:54 2011 From: g.brandl at gmx.net (Georg Brandl) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 21:17:54 +0100 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Removing /moin/ suffix from wiki.python.org In-Reply-To: <87vcp0v9sq.fsf@asaph.rhodesmill.org> References: <4EEFBD8A.2050907@v.loewis.de> <201112200107.50280.paul@boddie.org.uk> <4EF04639.9020905@egenix.com> <4EFB37D9.5000101@egenix.com> <87vcp0v9sq.fsf@asaph.rhodesmill.org> Message-ID: <4EFB7972.3070703@gmx.net> On 12/28/2011 07:19 PM, Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote: > I am: > > +1 > > ... on removing the extraneous and noisy URL component. If I thought > that unnecessary, implementation-waving cruft and verbosity was > tolerable, then I suspect I would not be writing Python in the first > place. :) > +1. Georg From michael at voidspace.org.uk Thu Dec 29 00:29:09 2011 From: michael at voidspace.org.uk (Michael Foord) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 23:29:09 +0000 Subject: [pydotorg-www] Fwd: Please add "Radio Free Python" to the list of podcasts References: <4EFB1702.1060804@hastings.org> Message-ID: <0ED1E38C-13DA-4C5C-A978-A21298FA16F6@voidspace.org.uk> Begin forwarded message: > From: Larry Hastings > Subject: Please add "Radio Free Python" to the list of podcasts > Date: 28 December 2011 13:17:54 GMT > To: webmaster at python.org > > > > Howdy, I'm the guy behind the podcast "Radio Free Python". I'd like to see it listed on the python.org pages listing podcasts. Please use the canonical site address: > http://radiofreepython.com/ > > I realize I've only released four episodes so far. On the other hand, RFP is the only Python podcast currently releasing new episodes. All the podcasts currently listed on python.org (Python 411, A Little Bit Of Python, From Python Import Podcast, Jython Podcast, DjangoDose) haven't released a new episode in six months, if not longer. I think it'd be nice to have something lively listed on those pages :) > > > Cheers, > > > larry -- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From solipsis at pitrou.net Fri Dec 30 14:37:59 2011 From: solipsis at pitrou.net (Antoine Pitrou) Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 13:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [pydotorg-www] dinsdale rebooted Message-ID: Hello, dinsdale was unresponsive (all the services) so I've rebooted it. The services should go back online after the boot sequence is finished. (hopefully I didn't mess with anything when doing that) Regards Antoine.