[pypy-svn] r15824 - pypy/dist/pypy/interpreter/pyparser/test

[adim at codespeak.net]

Author: adim
Date: Tue Aug  9 16:48:09 2005
New Revision: 15824

Modified:
   pypy/dist/pypy/interpreter/pyparser/test/test_samples.py
Log:
hackish workaround to make test pass even if empty lists are used instead of empty tuples in stablecompiler

Modified: pypy/dist/pypy/interpreter/pyparser/test/test_samples.py
==============================================================================
--- pypy/dist/pypy/interpreter/pyparser/test/test_samples.py	(original)
+++ pypy/dist/pypy/interpreter/pyparser/test/test_samples.py	Tue Aug  9 16:48:09 2005
@@ -104,8 +104,16 @@
         # XXX hack:
         # hide the more common difference between 2.3 and 2.4, which is
         #   Function(None, ...)  where 'None' stands for no decorator in 2.4
-        repr_pypy   = repr_pypy  .replace("Function(None, ", "Function(")
+        repr_pypy   = repr_pypy.replace("Function(None, ", "Function(")
         repr_python = repr_python.replace("Function(None, ", "Function(")
+        # XXX hack(bis):
+        #   we changed stablecompiler to use [] instead of () in several
+        #   places (for consistency), so let's make sure the test won't fail
+        #   because of that (the workaround is as drastic as the way we
+        #   compare python and pypy tuples :-), but we'll change that with
+        #   astbuilder.py
+        repr_pypy = repr_pypy.replace("[]", "()")
+        repr_python = repr_python.replace("[]", "()")
     assert repr_pypy == repr_python