[pypy-svn] r78169 - pypy/extradoc/talk/pepm2011

[cfbolz at codespeak.net]

Author: cfbolz
Date: Thu Oct 21 14:02:26 2010
New Revision: 78169

Modified:
   pypy/extradoc/talk/pepm2011/escape-tracing.pdf
   pypy/extradoc/talk/pepm2011/paper.tex
Log:
add line numbers


Modified: pypy/extradoc/talk/pepm2011/escape-tracing.pdf
==============================================================================
Binary files. No diff available.

Modified: pypy/extradoc/talk/pepm2011/paper.tex
==============================================================================
--- pypy/extradoc/talk/pepm2011/paper.tex	(original)
+++ pypy/extradoc/talk/pepm2011/paper.tex	Thu Oct 21 14:02:26 2010
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
   showstringspaces=false,
   %keywords={def,while,if,elif,return,class,get,set,new,guard_class}
   numberstyle = \tiny,
-  numbersep = 0pt,
+  numbersep = -20pt,
 }
 
 
@@ -591,10 +591,10 @@
 The following operations (lines 10-17) are more interesting:
 % XXX line numbers
 
-\begin{lstlisting}[mathescape,xleftmargin=20pt]
-$p_{5}$ = new(BoxedInteger)
-set($p_{5}$, intval, $i_{4}$)
-$p_{6}$ = new(BoxedInteger)
+\begin{lstlisting}[mathescape,xleftmargin=20pt,numbers=right,escapechar=|, firstnumber=10]
+$p_{5}$ = new(BoxedInteger)   |\setcounter{lstnumber}{11}|
+set($p_{5}$, intval, $i_{4}$) |\setcounter{lstnumber}{14}|
+$p_{6}$ = new(BoxedInteger)   |\setcounter{lstnumber}{16}|
 set($p_{6}$, intval, -100)
 \end{lstlisting}
 
@@ -622,12 +622,10 @@
 The subsequent operations (line 19-29) in Figure~\ref{fig:unopt-trace}, which
 use $p_{5}$ and $p_{6}$, can then be optimized using that knowledge:
 
-\begin{lstlisting}[mathescape,xleftmargin=20pt]
-guard_class($p_{5}$, BoxedInteger)
-# inside BoxedInteger.add
+\begin{lstlisting}[mathescape,xleftmargin=20pt,numbers=right,escapechar=|, firstnumber=20]
+guard_class($p_{5}$, BoxedInteger)  |\setcounter{lstnumber}{21}|
 $i_{7}$ = get($p_{5}$, intval)
-guard_class($p_{6}$, BoxedInteger)
-# inside BoxedInteger.add__int
+guard_class($p_{6}$, BoxedInteger)  |\setcounter{lstnumber}{24}|
 $i_{8}$ = get($p_{6}$, intval)
 $i_{9}$ = int_add($i_{7}$, $i_{8}$)
 \end{lstlisting}
@@ -640,7 +638,7 @@
 replaced by $i_{4}$ and -100. The only operation put into the optimized trace
 is the addition:
 
-\begin{lstlisting}[mathescape,xleftmargin=20pt]
+\begin{lstlisting}[mathescape,xleftmargin=20pt,numbers=right,escapechar=|, firstnumber=26]
 $i_{9}$ = int_add($i_{4}$, -100)
 \end{lstlisting}
 
@@ -667,11 +665,11 @@
 because the static objects could form an arbitrary graph structure. In our
 example is is simple, though:
 
-\begin{lstlisting}[mathescape,xleftmargin=20pt]
-$p_{15}$ = new(BoxedInteger)
-set($p_{15}$, intval, $i_{14}$)
-$p_{10}$ = new(BoxedInteger)
-set($p_{10}$, intval, $i_{9}$)
+\begin{lstlisting}[mathescape,xleftmargin=20pt,numbers=right,escapechar=|, firstnumber=44]
+$p_{15}$ = new(BoxedInteger)               |\setcounter{lstnumber}{45}|
+set($p_{15}$, intval, $i_{14}$)            |\setcounter{lstnumber}{26}|
+$p_{10}$ = new(BoxedInteger)               |\setcounter{lstnumber}{28}|
+set($p_{10}$, intval, $i_9$)               |\setcounter{lstnumber}{54}|
 jump($p_{15}$, $p_{10}$)
 \end{lstlisting}
 
@@ -692,7 +690,7 @@
 and only three \lstinline{guard_class} operations, from the original seven.
 
 \begin{figure}
-\begin{lstlisting}[mathescape,numbers=right,escapechar=|,numberstyle = \tiny,numbersep=0pt, numberblanklines=false]
+\begin{lstlisting}[mathescape,numbers=right,escapechar=|, numberblanklines=false]
 # arguments to the trace: $p_{0}$, $p_{1}$ |\setcounter{lstnumber}{2}|
 guard_class($p_1$, BoxedInteger)           |\setcounter{lstnumber}{4}|
 $i_2$ = get($p_1$, intval)