[pypy-commit] pypy.org extradoc: Make sure not to lose the links.

[alex_gaynor]

Author: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor at gmail.com>
Branch: extradoc
Changeset: r204:6f55ab31a383
Date: 2011-07-01 21:52 -0700
http://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy.org/changeset/6f55ab31a383/

Log:	Make sure not to lose the links.

diff --git a/source/success.txt b/source/success.txt
--- a/source/success.txt
+++ b/source/success.txt
@@ -10,19 +10,20 @@
 --------------------
 
 LWN has a tool they use for parsing "git log"'s output in order to do analysis
-on the contributors to the Linux kernel. Simply by switching to PyPy they were
-able to get a 3x speedup, from 63 seconds to 21 seconds, compared to CPython.
+on the contributors to the Linux kernel. Simply `by switching to PyPy`_ they
+were able to get a 3x speedup, from 63 seconds to 21 seconds, compared to
+CPython.
 
 "In other ways, PyPy is ready for prime time; it implements the (Python 2.x) language faithfully, and it is fast."
 
-.. _`an experiment`: http://lwn.net/Articles/442268/
+.. _`by switching to PyPy`: http://lwn.net/Articles/442268/
 
 MyHDL
 -----
 
-MyHDL got a speed up by 6-12x, on various benchmarks, according to their
-`performance page`_, putting it in the same league as other HDL implementations.
+MyHDL got a speed up by `6-12x compared to CPython`_, on a range of benchmarks,
+putting it in the same league as other HDL implementations.
 
 "By simply changing the Python interpreter, MyHDL is playing in the same league as Verilog and VHDL simulators. This is a remarkable achievement, given that Python's power stays completely available. There is no reason anymore to avoid MyHDL because of performance concerns."
 
-.. _`performance page`: http://www.myhdl.org/doku.php/performance
+.. _`6-12x compared to CPython`: http://www.myhdl.org/doku.php/performance