[pypy-dev] Re: [Python-Dev] Property syntax

Oren Tirosh oren-py-l at hishome.net
Sun Feb 2 18:54:34 CET 2003

On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 01:21:03PM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > > That's all fine and dandy, but then I don't understand how the poor
> > > implementation of property is going to extract __get__ etc. from the
> > > local variables of the function body after executing it.
> > 
> > Sort of.  Each keyword can handle the thunk differently.  For the
> > property keyword, it'd be handled more similarly to a class.  In fact,
> > class then becomes
> > 
> >     def C as class:
> >         suite
> Um, the whole point of this syntax is that property, synchronized
> etc. do *not* have to be keywords -- they are just callables.

class C(X, Y):


def C(X, Y) as type:	


C = type('C', (X, Y), CODE, GLOBALS)

The type constructor currently expects a dictionary as third argument.
It will need to be modified to do the equivalent of:

class_namespace = {}
exec CODE in class_namespace, GLOBALS

And class_namespace will be initialized to the equivalent dictionary.

For functions:

def F(args...):


def F(CODE, GLOBALS, 'F', ARGDEFS) as function:


F = function(CODE, GLOBALS, 'F', ARGDEFS)

CCed to the PyPython list because looking at the creation of function
and type objects this way may help bootstrapping - the 'function'
and 'type' factories could be written in Python using some kind of 
more primitive callable construct added as a crutch for PyPython.


More information about the Pypy-dev mailing list