[pypy-dev] Questions about the C core
Marc Recht
marc at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Mon Jan 13 20:24:02 CET 2003
> I have the same goal. I also don't hesitate to use
> some abbreviative tools for repeated code, maybe.
> But only if it helps to simplify, not to change the
> language.
I was only thinking about the actual build process, not about the language
itself.
> Furthermore, thinking of macros again, they make
[...]
I 100% agree with you. Changing the language isn't a good idea.
> XML on the other hand, as an intermediate language
> or for pickling makes sense to me. At least it is easier
> to parse than Python. (But we *have* the parser...)
I thought about using XML as a formal description for generating stuff. For
example CastorXML (a java xml databinding framework,
http://castor.exolab.org) uses XML Schemata to generate simple data classes
with XML marshaling/unmarshaling functionality.. Though I'm not sure at
which part of the MiniPy build process generating code could be useful, I
think it should be kept in mind.
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." -- Donald E. Knuth
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pypy-dev/attachments/20030113/d727b952/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Pypy-dev
mailing list