[pypy-dev] Builtin types
Armin Rigo
arigo at tunes.org
Tue Jan 28 15:24:42 CET 2003
Hello Bengt,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:15:20AM -0800, Bengt Richter wrote:
>
> meta_eval(i386_call_thunk_representation_as_bitstruct)
The abstract idea is great, but why is it so low-level? Generalizing the
various forms of procedure invocations is something that I would certainly
like to do (although it is maybe too soon right now). But why does the
representation have to be bits? Even Python's code objects are more than a
string of bytes.
What would be useful in my opinion is the definition of a Python interface
that can be implemented by various notions of "code objects", including
CPython's code objects, CPython's built-in function objects, and anything else
from Psyco- or GCC-produced machine code to Prolog rules compiled by PyLog.
A bientôt,
Armin.
More information about the Pypy-dev
mailing list