[pypy-dev] Re: [pypy-svn] r5649 - pypy/trunk/src/pypy (fwd)

Richard Emslie rxe at ukshells.co.uk
Sun Jul 25 23:09:15 CEST 2004

Sorry, really ought to learn how to use email!  Obviously none of the 
intended parties got this. :-(

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:39:46 +0100 (BST)
From: Richard Emslie <rxe at ukshells.co.uk>
To: mwh at codespeak.net
Cc: pypy-svn at codespeak.net
Subject: Re: [pypy-svn] r5649 - pypy/trunk/src/pypy

Hi Michael!

On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 mwh at codespeak.net wrote:

> Author: mwh
> Date: Sat Jul 24 18:39:01 2004
> New Revision: 5649
> Modified:
>   pypy/trunk/src/pypy/TODO
> Log:
> Random updates.
> In my working tree I've commented out the code that prints interpreter-
> level tracebacks and have yet to miss them.  Should I check this in?

Think I got rid of also in traceinteractive.py...  if that counts for my vote 

> Modified: pypy/trunk/src/pypy/TODO
> ==============================================================================
> --- pypy/trunk/src/pypy/TODO	(original)


> * improve traceobjectspace! currently it only catches
>   calls from outside the space into the space but not
>   the ones where space operations involve calling more space
> -  operations (the latter are not traced)!
> +  operations (the latter are not traced)!  (fixed?)

AFAIK yes!  I've got some changes to checkin still (testit.py was broken and 
changing verbosity from traceinteractive.py)

Should we combine interactive.py and traceinteractive.py ?  (Since trace one 
was a blatant copy and paste hack :-)  - also a TODO I believe).  We could make 
interpreter level tracebacks a verbosity option?


More information about the Pypy-dev mailing list