[pypy-dev] Re: [pypy-svn] r5649 - pypy/trunk/src/pypy (fwd)
rxe at ukshells.co.uk
Sun Jul 25 23:09:15 CEST 2004
Sorry, really ought to learn how to use email! Obviously none of the
intended parties got this. :-(
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:39:46 +0100 (BST)
From: Richard Emslie <rxe at ukshells.co.uk>
To: mwh at codespeak.net
Cc: pypy-svn at codespeak.net
Subject: Re: [pypy-svn] r5649 - pypy/trunk/src/pypy
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 mwh at codespeak.net wrote:
> Author: mwh
> Date: Sat Jul 24 18:39:01 2004
> New Revision: 5649
> Random updates.
> In my working tree I've commented out the code that prints interpreter-
> level tracebacks and have yet to miss them. Should I check this in?
Think I got rid of also in traceinteractive.py... if that counts for my vote
> Modified: pypy/trunk/src/pypy/TODO
> --- pypy/trunk/src/pypy/TODO (original)
> * improve traceobjectspace! currently it only catches
> calls from outside the space into the space but not
> the ones where space operations involve calling more space
> - operations (the latter are not traced)!
> + operations (the latter are not traced)! (fixed?)
AFAIK yes! I've got some changes to checkin still (testit.py was broken and
changing verbosity from traceinteractive.py)
Should we combine interactive.py and traceinteractive.py ? (Since trace one
was a blatant copy and paste hack :-) - also a TODO I believe). We could make
interpreter level tracebacks a verbosity option?
More information about the Pypy-dev