[pypy-dev] Re: Rtyping classes definitions?

[Antonio Cuni]

Michael Hudson wrote:
> Er.  Well.  I am almost entirely sure that your current approach of
> (simplified):
> 
>     for graph in self.translator.graphs:
>         f = Function(graph)
>         f.render(self.ilasm)
> 
> is not really going to work.  Have you looked at how (say) genc works?
> It first computes names for everything (the 'LowLevelDatabase'), and
> then spits out the code.  'everything' includes all the types
> referenced by the graphs, and because the graphs have been rtyped, the
> types you find are things like instances of ootype.Class.

Yes, I think you are probably right. It worked until now for simple 
experiments, but now I have to follow another approach, as I've just 
wrote to Niklaus. I hope to commit something usable tomorrow...

ciao Anto