[pypy-dev] Work plan for PyPy

Antonio Cuni anto.cuni at gmail.com
Fri Jun 15 01:06:24 CEST 2007

Maciek Fijalkowski wrote:

> * What we do with ootypesystem backends and external functions? Right 
> now this is implemented by backends which tends to be a bit ugly 
> implementation. My idea would be to have backend-sensitive 
> implementations which access backend-specific RPython functions for 
> accessing underlaying platform classes/functions/whatever.

I agree. Supporting external functions directly in the backend is 
easier, but now that gencli can call .NET code we don't need those 
functions to be external anymore, we can just provide a real 
implementation for them.

The problem is that at the moment genjvm can't call java functions, so 
this solution would not work for it.

ciao Anto

More information about the Pypy-dev mailing list