[pypy-dev] missing things for making PyPy "production" ready (for some value of production)

Neal Becker ndbecker2 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 15 14:06:33 CET 2007


David Cournapeau wrote:

> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>
>> Yes, this one would be a major challenge. If you can crack it and the
>> PyPy interpreter offers another benefit (an obvious one is speed), you
>> will be in awesome position. If not, the other benefits will have to
>> weigh more strongly. This is definitely one to evolve slowly over time
>> if it's possible at all.
> I don't understand the C++ part. How many useful python modules use C++
> ? For a start, my understanding is that python itself (interprter +
> stdlib) do not use C++ at all. Wrapping C++ in any language other than
> itself is a pain anyway :)
> 
I use this extensively.  I have a large library of signal processing that is
written in c++ using boost-python.  All the c++ code is written in generic
style, with concrete instantiations exposed to python.





More information about the Pypy-dev mailing list