Carl Friedrich Bolz
cfbolz at gmx.de
Wed Mar 24 14:40:50 CET 2010
On 03/23/2010 10:43 PM, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Can we decide if the following branches have been merged, are useful
> enough to be merged, need more work, "maybe one day", are very outdated,
> or turned out just to be a plain bad idea? The numbers are the rev
> number of the last change.
> Also, what about separating in-development branches that we expect to
> merge or kill soon, from the branches that are for "some other idea",
> e.g. "effect-analysis", which may not be merged in a long while but
> still we may want to keep around?
Maybe just have a dir parallel to "branch" called "inactive"? or some
> * 71164 abort-no-asm (fijal, cfbolz)
Keep around, I want to reconsider this eventually.
> * 70752 bridges-experimental (cfbolz)
> * 71270 kill-can-inline (cfbolz)
> * 66009 type-celldict (cfbolz)
Killed this one.
> * 70890 unroll-safe-if-const-arg (fijal, cfbolz, arigo)
Would keep this around, even if it ultimately didn't work.
More information about the Pypy-dev