fijall at gmail.com
Thu Mar 25 04:51:38 CET 2010
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Armin Rigo <arigo at tunes.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Can we decide if the following branches have been merged, are useful
> enough to be merged, need more work, "maybe one day", are very outdated,
> or turned out just to be a plain bad idea? The numbers are the rev
> number of the last change.
> Also, what about separating in-development branches that we expect to
> merge or kill soon, from the branches that are for "some other idea",
> e.g. "effect-analysis", which may not be merged in a long while but
> still we may want to keep around?
> * 70689 jit-profiling (pedronis, fijal)
> * 55472 judy-trees (fijal)
> * 64690 pypycpp (igorto)
I suppose that's to-be-killed
> * 70890 unroll-safe-if-const-arg (fijal, cfbolz, arigo)
I would like this to be kept around until jit is powerful enough to handle that.
More information about the Pypy-dev