drsalists at gmail.com
Wed Nov 24 01:13:16 CET 2010
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Antonio Cuni <anto.cuni at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 18/11/10 01:17, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> Given #1 and #2 above, anydbm should continue working, due to the presence
>> gdbm and dumbdbm.
>> I guess I think that if someone has a need for bsddb (and it's assorted
>> interfaces), they probably should work on that.
>> Sound reasonable?
> Yes. To me it sounds reasonable. I don't know if it's correct because I
> never used any of those modules, but it's surely reasoable :-).
> I think that the best would be if you get an account on codespeak and do
> that in a branch: this way we can follow your commits and the if everything
> is fine we merge it.
> I personally cannot create new accounts on codespeak, so you should ask
> someone else for this (e.g. Armin Rigo): the easiest way is if you just come
> on #pypy on freenode.net and talk with us "real-time".
I've created a branch at http://codespeak.net/svn/pypy/branch/gdbm and made
the proposed changes in it.
I took the liberty of creating an "attic" directory to put dbm.py in.
Please let me know if there are further changes required related to this.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pypy-dev