drsalists at gmail.com
Wed Nov 24 18:04:18 CET 2010
One tiny reason: People tend to forget that they can pull things from SVN
history, when an isolated file disappears. I'm expecting someday someone's
going to want to add bsddb - when they do, dbm.py might be a decent starting
point (but it likely has memory leaks that were corrected in gdbm.py).
I'd be happy to delete it if that's the consensus.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Carl Friedrich Bolz <cfbolz at gmx.de> wrote:
> On 11/24/2010 01:13 AM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> > I've created a branch at http://codespeak.net/svn/pypy/branch/gdbm and
> > made the proposed changes in it.
> > I took the liberty of creating an "attic" directory to put dbm.py in.
> Any reason not to just delete dbm.py? This attic stuff is annoying, and
> if necessary you can still get the file from svn history.
> Carl Friedrich
> pypy-dev at codespeak.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pypy-dev