[pypy-dev] python 3

[Yury Selivanov]

On 2011-08-16, at 8:25 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> Personally I think #3 is the only sane path.  We *need* a Python 2 VM for the forseeable future.  We're pretty lucky in that the JIT, GC, and all the honest to god complex code is totally seperate from the VM, so just supporting 2 Python VMs is kind of easy (compared to maintaing 2 JITs or something).

Well, if everybody agrees on the 3rd option, then can we have at least the process of porting outlined and reviewed by core devs?  No need for a super-detailed PEP, though.  A simple guideline would help a lot.