[pypy-dev] New version of Codespeed (0.7) for speed.pypy.org

Miquel Torres tobami at googlemail.com
Sun Jan 23 20:37:39 CET 2011


It doesn't sound like a bad idea. But how would you save the branch data?


2011/1/21  <exarkun at twistedmatrix.com>:
> On 06:14 pm, anto.cuni at gmail.com wrote:
>>On 21/01/11 08:49, Miquel Torres wrote:
>>>@Anto
>>>
>>>Yes, branches are a pending item that has been requested a couple of
>>>times now.
>>
>>yes, I think most of the requests has been by me :)
>>>The current solution is actually not to abuse an environment like you
>>>say, but to create a new project for a branch. That way it gets
>>>cleanly separated, and in a way branches are like different projects.
>>>But it is of course not optimal. Technically it is very easy to come
>>>up with several solutions (add a branch dimension, for example), but
>>>interface-wise it is not easy to find something that doesn't clutter
>>>things.
>>
>>Uhm, I don't think that using a different project is a good idea. For
>>branches, we are usually not much interested in the branch history, but
>>in the
>>comparison with trunk (ideally, with trunk at the point we created the
>>branch,
>>or at the point of the last merge from trunk).
>>
>>As for visualize changes, I think that we don't need anything fancy,
>>for
>>example it would be already immensely useful to have the possibility of
>>displaying the Changes page in a way that it compares the performances
>>of the
>>branch against trunk.
>
> How about a "Branches" checkbox (per project?  per executable?  per
> graph?  One of those maybe).  When it's checked, branch results within
> the revision horizon (last 10, 50, 200, etc) get plotted on the same
> graph as the trunk data is plotted.  Each branch could be a different
> color, perhaps (but would at least have hover info telling you what it
> is).
>
> This implies adding a branch column to the results table (or is it the
> revisions table?).
>
> Maybe that's just the obvious way to do it and everyone else already
> thought of and discarded it already, though.
>
> Actually, in general I'd like a way to plot more things on one graph.
> So maybe this is just a special case of that.
>
> Jean-Paul
> _______________________________________________
> pypy-dev at codespeak.net
> http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
>



More information about the Pypy-dev mailing list