[pypy-dev] List Slicing Performance Drop

Maciej Fijalkowski fijall at gmail.com
Tue May 31 09:13:55 CEST 2011


Anto: what version of python did you use? There can be 2.6 vs 2.7 issue

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Antonio Cuni <anto.cuni at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20/05/11 23:23, Mohyiddeen Othman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been recently doing Project Euler puzzles using Python, and have recently
>> started to use PyPy to increase performance. However I've come across
>> something (no pun intended) puzzling. I made this script for Euler #50.
>>
>> http://pastebin.com/VZ12Nsci
>>
>> It calculates all the primes under 1M first, then looks through them for a
>> solution. The first part (finding primes) is blazing fast under PyPy (as
>> expected). But in the second part PyPy lags behind. CPython managed it in
>> 183s, while PyPy did it in 498s. I'm assuming it has something to do with the
>> list slicing?
>
> I cannot reproduce, for me pypy is faster on both pieces of code:
>
> viper ~ $ pypy-c /tmp/euler.py
> ('All primes below', 1000000, 'found')
> 0.43
> Max sequence is:
> ....
> ....
> ('It contains', 543, 'elements')
> ('The sum is', 997651)
> 72.61
>
>
> viper ~ $ python /tmp/euler.py
> ('All primes below', 1000000, 'found')
> 4.58
> Max sequence is:
> ....
> ....
> ('It contains', 543, 'elements')
> ('The sum is', 997651)
> 128.81
>
>
> Could you tell us more about your environment, like which OS, cpu, 32/64 bit
> and the exact version of pypy/cpython you used to do the benchmark please?
>
> ciao,
> Anto
> _______________________________________________
> pypy-dev mailing list
> pypy-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
>


More information about the pypy-dev mailing list