[pypy-dev] cppyy use case question
wlavrijsen at lbl.gov
wlavrijsen at lbl.gov
Wed Jun 6 09:10:36 CEST 2012
Hi Armin,
> But IMHO the main slow part that should be optimized (probably by
> being rewritten from scratch) is the correspondance between the proxy
> PyObject structures and the real PyPy objects, which is exactly the
> part that interests you too. It should be possible at least to cope
> with only one dict lookup instead of at least two to do the roundtrip
> "pypy obj -> cpyext obj -> pypy obj".
I'll need to understand first in more detail how cpyext works, but it is
good motivation to know that a dict lookup can be removed. In cppyy, I
have a similar, but reversed, problem: keeping track of all C++ objects
to guarantee object identity. Since the bound object carries a pointer
to the C++ object, a round trip has only one dict lookup, the other
"lookup" being a data member access.
If I understand correctly what you describe above, then perhaps giving
the "PyPyObject by pointer" as payload to the PyObject could help, too.
Best regards,
Wim
--
WLavrijsen at lbl.gov -- +1 (510) 486 6411 -- www.lavrijsen.net
More information about the pypy-dev
mailing list