[pypy-dev] Killing OOType? (was Re: Translating pypy on FreeBSD with CLI backend)
alex.gaynor at gmail.com
Wed May 8 23:27:57 CEST 2013
I agree with this, the abstraction doesn't really work well right now,
there's way too much code duplication. If we seriously want to have an
lltype/ootype distinction this should be redone from scratch (IMO).
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Ronny Pfannschmidt <
Ronny.Pfannschmidt at gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
> since there basically is no maintained ootype backend
> i wonder about removing the ootype vs lltype abstraction together with
> -- Ronny
> On 05/08/2013 11:12 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 9:50 PM, David Naylor<naylor.b.david at gmail.**com<naylor.b.david at gmail.com>>
>>> On Wednesday, 8 May 2013 13:35:00 Alex Gaynor wrote:
>>>> We should probably just delete it at this point, it's completely
>>>> unmaintained, doesn't work, and just confuses people; if someone wants
>>>> ressurect it, hg log should be good enough.
>>> Isn't JVM in a similar state (although I think someone may be working on
>>> if my memory of emails on the list serves me).
>> It is
>> pypy-dev mailing list
>> pypy-dev at python.org
> pypy-dev mailing list
> pypy-dev at python.org
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to
say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire)
"The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero
GPG Key fingerprint: 125F 5C67 DFE9 4084
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the pypy-dev