[pypy-dev] FreeBSD 9.2 buildslave: first run
Maciej Fijalkowski
fijall at gmail.com
Sun Nov 17 18:09:00 CET 2013
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Tobias Oberstein
<tobias.oberstein at tavendo.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the new FreeBSD buildslave has run the first time:
>
> http://buildbot.pypy.org/builders/pypy-c-jit-freebsd-9-x86-64/builds/6
>
> PyPy was built successfully, but there are a couple of issues:
>
> https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1637
> https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1638
> https://bugs.pypy.org/issue1639
>
> I'll address those.
>
> There is another issue that bugs me .. look at the built times:
>
> [Timer] Timings:
> [Timer] annotate --- 576.0 s
> [Timer] rtype_lltype --- 1323.7 s
> [Timer] pyjitpl_lltype --- 1098.6 s
> [Timer] backendopt_lltype --- 314.2 s
> [Timer] stackcheckinsertion_lltype --- 161.5 s
> [Timer] database_c --- 451.3 s
> [Timer] source_c --- 668.5 s
> [Timer] compile_c --- 2403.8 s
> [Timer] ===========================================
> [Timer] Total: --- 6997.6 s
>
> and compare with "Linux 64 on allegro64":
>
> [Timer] Timings:
> [Timer] annotate --- 641.5 s
> [Timer] rtype_lltype --- 1528.5 s
> [Timer] pyjitpl_lltype --- 938.7 s
> [Timer] backendopt_lltype --- 242.2 s
> [Timer] stackcheckinsertion_lltype --- 206.8 s
> [Timer] database_c --- 325.3 s
> [Timer] source_c --- 357.7 s
> [Timer] compile_c --- 246.4 s
> [Timer] ===========================================
> [Timer] Total: --- 4487.1 s
>
> *****
>
> Why the heck does "compile_c" take 10x the time on FreeBSD?
>
> Note that FreeBSD builder uses Clang .. could that be a reason?
>
> Any hints on that are welcome!
>
> Cheers,
> Tobias
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pypy-dev mailing list
> pypy-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
I would guess because we can't guess the number of processors we don't
parallelize the build correctly.
More information about the pypy-dev
mailing list