[pypy-dev] Getting involved

[John Smith]

Yes. But tail-call optimization is a performance optimization, so it goes
well with PyPy. I wanted to suggest to Travis that he not be discouraged
from his idea and give him another idea for getting tail-call more widely
used compared to making his own fork of PyPy.

On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:27 PM, John Smith <4u5vjqpb at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > As a less objectionable alternative, what about a package which when
> passed
> > code (string/code object/not sure) returns a newly compiled object with
> tail
> > call optimization?
>
> you can do that in pure python (it does not have to be a part of pypy
> in any sense)
>
> >
> > J
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > pypy-dev mailing list
> > pypy-dev at python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pypy-dev/attachments/20140708/c92a08ab/attachment.html>