[pypy-dev] PyParallel-style threads
Michał Domański
mdomans at gmail.com
Mon Jun 20 11:02:46 EDT 2016
So I actually thought about similar approach. I was curious what do you
think about approach to concurrency similar to what Apple did with C blocks
and GCD. That is: enable threading but instead of the STM approach have
fully explicit mutations within atomic blocks
2016-06-20 16:53 GMT+02:00 Armin Rigo <arigo at tunes.org>:
> Hi Omer,
>
> On 20 June 2016 at 08:51, Omer Katz <omer.drow at gmail.com> wrote:
> > As for implementation, if we can trace the code running in the thread and
> > ensure it's not mutating global state and that CPyExt is never used
> during
> > the thread's course we can simply release the GIL when such a thread is
> run.
>
> That's a very hand-wavy and vague description. To start with, how do
> you define exactly "not mutating global state"? We are not allowed to
> write to any of the objects that existed before we started the thread?
> It may be possible to have such an implementation, yes. Actually,
> that's probably easy: tweak the STM code to crash instead of doing
> something more complicated when we write to an old object.
>
> I'm not sure how useful that would be---or how useful PyParallel is on
> CPython. Maybe if you can point us to real usages of PyParallel it
> would be a start.
>
>
> A bientôt,
>
> Armin.
> _______________________________________________
> pypy-dev mailing list
> pypy-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
>
--
---------------------------
Michał Domański
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pypy-dev/attachments/20160620/2e5def8c/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the pypy-dev
mailing list