[pypy-issue] [issue1470] Implement python3 sys.setswitchinterval()
tracker at bugs.pypy.org
Sat Jun 29 15:04:00 CEST 2013
Armin Rigo <armin.rigo at gmail.com> added the comment:
Note that PyPy's method is almost like CPython, but with an additional twist:
the thread that releases the GIL is not allowed to be the first one to acquire
it again, if another thread is waiting.
We should think about this in the context of the JIT. Right now every compiled
loop decrements the "bytecode counter" by some amount computed a bit randomly
from the length of the loop. We could instead use the fast instruction to get
the CPU timer. Note that there are additional CPU-dependent issues, like the
fact that the CPU timers of multiple cores are out-of-sync; moreover it's
unclear if other CPUs than x86 have a required super-efficient timer.
These are all reasons for why the current solution works "well enough", and why
it's a bit delicate to change it without a global RPython change (that would
also affect other interpreters than PyPy-for-3.2).
nosy: +arigo -pjenvey
status: unread -> chatting
PyPy bug tracker <tracker at bugs.pypy.org>
More information about the pypy-issue