[pytest-dev] 2.8.0 release plan? 2.7.2?

holger krekel holger at merlinux.eu
Thu Jun 18 10:42:41 CEST 2015


On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:22 +0200, Tibor Arpas wrote:
> How about the new hook call system vs the old __multicall__ ? Is the plan
> still to deprecate the old way in 2.8 and remove in 2.9?

yes, that's the plan.

> Any idea how many plugin-s use it and will brake (or were already updated)?

IIRC most pytest-dev plugins don't use __multicall__ last time i checked.

holger


> Tibor
> 
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:47 AM, holger krekel <holger at merlinux.eu> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 22:06 -0700, Floris Bruynooghe wrote:
> > > On 17 June 2015 at 05:31, Bruno Oliveira <nicoddemus at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi, Do we have an idea of when we would like have a 2.8.0 release, or
> > at
> > > > least what we would like to see in the new version?
> > >
> > > Nope, maybe the pluggy dependency?  But not sure if that was the plan.
> >
> > FWIW I consider to vendor the pluggy dependency before pytest-2.8 is
> > released.
> > The main issue is that as projects start using pluggy indepdently of pytest
> > there might be version conflicts when pluggy gets new releases, making
> > it hard to test pluggy-using projects with pytest.
> >
> > > > And about 2.7.2?
> > >
> > > I think we should release that as soon as the python 3.5 compatibility
> > > is sorted.  I'm on holiday for a few days though so won't get to look
> > > at this again until mid-next week (but don't let that stop someone
> > > else ;-)).
> > >
> > > I think Ronny had some 2.7.2 plans as well or wanted it soon for some
> > reason?
> > >
> > > > I see
> > > > there are a couple of fixes that are in master but should be
> > backported to
> > > > pytest-2.7 branch before making a 2.7.2 release.
> > >
> > > Hmm, if they where fixes I guess they should have gone to 2.7 right
> > > away.  Sometimes the line is a bit blurry though.  It obviously
> > > doesn't matter much if 2.8 overtakes 2.7.2, so if there's nothing
> > > important that needs to happen for 2.8 then that would be fine too.
> >
> > Maybe we can just aim for pytest-2.8 in the next two weeks and forget
> > about pytest-2.7.2 and then see to have more clarity regarding PR targets.
> > Would it make sense to consider "master" to become the new "bug fix branch"
> > and have a "pytest-2.9" then where we collect new features? This way
> > the default is to do bugfixes which might be easier for newcomers to
> > the project.
> >
> > best,
> > holger
> > _______________________________________________
> > pytest-dev mailing list
> > pytest-dev at python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
> >

-- 
about me:    http://holgerkrekel.net/about-me/
contracting: http://merlinux.eu


More information about the pytest-dev mailing list