[pytest-dev] [proposal] experiment with adapting gitmate.io for automating issue maintenance/triaging tasks

Bruno Oliveira nicoddemus at gmail.com
Fri Dec 8 15:05:46 EST 2017


Sounds good, thanks.

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 5:52 PM Ronny Pfannschmidt <
opensource at ronnypfannschmidt.de> wrote:

> i propose that unless someone vetos, i'll take a look into activating it
> for pytest-dev/pytest on monday.
>
> -- Ronny
>
> Am Freitag, den 08.12.2017, 18:12 +0000 schrieb Bruno Oliveira:
>
> Howdy Ronny,
>
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 2:36 PM Ronny Pfannschmidt <
> opensource at ronnypfannschmidt.de> wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> a while back the people behind gitmate.io did interview me to expand
> their perspective with focus on how pytest does things as well as how i
> do certain things at work,
>
> they also provided me with a basic example on what i would have done
> for pytest:
>
> https://gitmate.io/report/https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpytest-dev%2Fpytest
>
> i beleive it would help to free up a lof of volunteer time from issue
> triaging to start and use such a tool.
>
>
> Looking at the features page[1] it indeed does seem helpful.
>
> I'm definitely +1 to use GitMate if it will help us cut down on issue
> triaging. We can always disable it later if it is not working out for us.
>
> [1] https://gitmate.io/features
>
> Cheers,
> Bruno
>
>
>
> -- Ronny
> _______________________________________________
> pytest-dev mailing list
> pytest-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pytest-dev/attachments/20171208/2f5b17ec/attachment.html>


More information about the pytest-dev mailing list