[pytest-dev] [core] Tidelift Funding
Ronny Pfannschmidt
opensource at ronnypfannschmidt.de
Mon May 6 17:58:50 EDT 2019
Am 06.05.19 um 16:03 schrieb Bruno Oliveira:
> Hi Ronny,
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 11:09 AM Ronny Pfannschmidt
> <opensource at ronnypfannschmidt.de
> <mailto:opensource at ronnypfannschmidt.de>> wrote:
>
> i think its a good idea to have this as a opt-in.
>
> Currently a Fair Share Mechanism on a opt in basis seems fair,
> if we ever hit a situation where someone could have a reasonably
> set up part/full-time position primarily on pytest we should take
> a look at how division is fair in that case.
>
>
> Agreed, thanks Ronny.
>
> If nobody objects, I plan to move this forward later this week.
>
> One question is how do we track which maintainers are opting to
> receive funding.
>
> I'm thinking of opening an issue which lists the contributors
> receiving the funding; maintainers are then free to post a comment
> indicating if they want to start/stop receiving funding, at which
> point we update the original post. Another option would be to use the
> Wiki, but we don't receive change notifications so there's a chance of
> we getting out of sync with the configuration on Tidelift. Suggestions?
>
we should make a git repo where we track meta level documentation,
that way we chould have a ci with credentials run the checks
i wonder if tidelift hasn an api published for that
> Another question is regarding admins of the Tidelift dashboard. I
> volunteer to do it, but would like more people to also be admins to
> reduce the bus factor, so other volunteers are appreciated as well.
in about 2-3 Months i can Commit to such role as well.
Cheers Ronny
>
> Cheers,
> Bruno.
>
> -- Ronny
>
>
> Am 03.05.19 um 14:11 schrieb Bruno Oliveira:
>> Hi Floris,
>>
>> On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 2:25 PM Floris Bruynooghe <flub at devork.be
>> <mailto:flub at devork.be>> wrote:
>>
>> Why the rules about active? Seems complicated and more open to
>> arguing. I liked the Pillow guidelines you linked:
>> https://github.com/orgs/pytest-dev/teams/contributors can express
>> interest and https://github.com/orgs/pytest-dev/teams/core
>> decides on
>> split (which I guess can be anything from 0% to 100%). With
>> the same
>> assumption that the core members are reasonable that should
>> end up as
>> roughly the same.
>>
>> Mind you in practice I have no issue with the above proposal
>> of people
>> right now, but would also not mind if e.g. hpk or ronny
>> wanted to be
>> part right now (I'll pass myself). Likewise there are
>> probably cases
>> where I wouldn't mind people not in core being paid for some
>> time.
>>
>>
>> I wrote those "rules" just to come up with a solid proposal in
>> the e-mail, but I do like yours better. Letting developers opt-in
>> to a share is fair and reasonable, certainly.
>>
>> I think we should even always split the funding evenly between
>> those opting to receive it, to further avoid any arguing on that.
>>
>> But in general I'm +1, let's make it happen if there's anyone
>> interested
>> in getting paid.
>>
>>
>> Great, let's see what others think.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bruno.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pytest-dev mailing list
>> pytest-dev at python.org <mailto:pytest-dev at python.org>
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytest-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pytest-dev/attachments/20190506/fe2d327e/attachment.html>
More information about the pytest-dev
mailing list