[Python-3000] After 2.6 should be 3.0
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Wed Apr 19 23:54:21 CEST 2006
"Josiah Carlson" <jcarlson at uci.edu> wrote in message
news:20060419091913.A82C.JCARLSON at uci.edu...
> It seems you are right (I was paying attention, but apparently to the
> wrong stuff); after going through most of the py3k list history, those
> changes that would have been backwards compatible were basically
> rejected.
That is because numerous more-or-less non-controversial code-breaking
changes have already been approved and listed in PEP 3100
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3100/
many before this list started. Now we are more thoroughly discussing and
getting pronouncements on things not approved before.
Terry Jan Reedy
More information about the Python-3000
mailing list