[Python-3000] sets in P3K?

Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Mon Apr 24 17:19:44 CEST 2006

On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 10:16 -0400, Greg Wilson wrote:

> I'm sure we can work something out --- I agree, {} for empty set and {:}
> for empty dict would be ideal, were it not for backward compatibility.

I dunno, the more I write dict() and set() the more I kind of like them
rather the literal alternatives (at least for the former).


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 309 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/attachments/20060424/7eb41084/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Python-3000 mailing list