[Python-3000] sets in P3K?

[Kay Schluehr]

Talin schrieb:

>A set with no elements is:
>
>   set()
>
>Alternatively, you could take the tuple idea one step further:
>
>   {,}
>  
>
If you want to simulate the mathematical notion of an empty set I would 
say that {/} has a stronger mnemonic appeal.
Furthermore: what about notions of infinite sets?

>However, I'm not sure I like this very much.
>  
>
I don't know if I like to be forced mixing functional and non-functional 
syntax to express the same kind of
entities.

Kay