[Python-3000] sets in P3K?

[Barry Warsaw]

On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 12:57 -0600, Steven Bethard wrote:
> On 4/27/06, Raymond Hettinger <rhettinger at ewtllc.com> wrote:
> > [pep-3100 checkin]
> > >  {F(x) for x in S if P(x)} means set(F(x) for x in S if P(x)).
> >
> > I presume this means that there will never be dictionary
> > comprehensions (as they would aspire to have an identical
> > notation).
> 
> Why would that be necessary?  Wouldn't
>     {F(x):G(x) for x in S if P(x)}
> be unambiguous?  (Not that I'm pushing for dict comprehensions -- I
> just don't see how if Guido wants both dict and set comprehensions, he
> couldn't have them.)

Can I unwithdraw PEP 274 now? <wink>

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 309 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/attachments/20060427/aec41e86/attachment.pgp