[Python-3000] threading, part 2
jcarlson at uci.edu
Fri Aug 11 18:15:32 CEST 2006
"Jason Orendorff" <jason.orendorff at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/11/06, Josiah Carlson <jcarlson at uci.edu> wrote:
> > Slawomir Nowaczyk <slawomir.nowaczyk.847 at student.lu.se> wrote:
> > > But it should not be done lightly and never when the code is not
> > > specifically expecting it.
> > If you don't want random exceptions being raised in your threads, then
> > don't use this method that is capable of raising exceptions somewhat
> > randomly.
> I agree. The only question is how dire the warnings should be.
> I'll answer that question with another question: Are we going to make
> the standard library robust against asynchronous exceptions? For
> example, class Thread has an attribute __stopped that is set using
> code similar to the example code I posted. An exception at just the
> wrong time would kill the thread while leaving __stopped == False.
> Maybe that particular case is worth fixing, but to find and fix them
> all? Better to put strong warnings on this one method: may cause
> unpredictable brokenness.
Considering that it will not be accessable via standard Python, only
through a few ctypes hoops, I believe that is a fairly ready indication
that one should be wary of its use. I also think it would make sense to
fix that particular instance (to not do so seems to be a bit foolish).
More information about the Python-3000